Skip to main content

Security report for atimana.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.atimana.org is a niche content platform focused on skincare product recommendations for women in their 40s, primarily in Japanese. It operates mainly as an affiliate marketing site promoting moisturizing lotions with curated rankings and product descriptions. The site lacks transparency in business information, contact details, and privacy compliance, which impacts its credibility. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with embedded JSON-LD structured data for breadcrumbs and includes third-party tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. Security posture is weak due to missing security headers, unknown SSL status, and absence of privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting trust in domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and business transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atimana.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site targets a specific demographic of middle-aged Japanese women interested in skincare, leveraging affiliate marketing as its revenue model. It lacks direct business contact information and certifications, indicating a small-scale or individual operation. The extensive use of external affiliate links and lack of corporate branding suggest a content-driven monetization approach rather than a product manufacturer or retailer. The site’s market position is niche with moderate content quality and basic user experience. Growth potential depends on improving trust signals and compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers is a concern. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content, but lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are missing, reducing preparedness for security events. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking without clear consent mechanisms. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, privacy policies, and transparent contact channels to improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and ensure all site resources load securely.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy laws.
  3. Publish clear contact information including email and phone for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden site security.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides curated recommendations and rankings of moisturizing lotions (化粧水) targeted at women in their 40s, focusing on skincare benefits such as hydration, anti-aging, and makeup base preparation.
Key services
Skincare product reviews, Affiliate product promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, JSON-LD, Research Artisan Pro tracking script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
A8.net
Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Marketing tools
Research Artisan Pro tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. Content is focused on skincare product recommendations for women in their 40s, primarily in Japanese language.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are provided.
  5. The site uses affiliate marketing links primarily through A8.net.
  6. No social media links or official company branding detected.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request or registry restrictions.
  8. Security headers and HTTPS status cannot be confirmed from provided data.
  9. Site uses a third-party tracking service (Research Artisan Pro) for analytics.
  10. Technical implementation is basic with room for improvement in SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML and CSS, with some JavaScript for tracking and JSON-LD for structured data. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected. The site loads affiliate marketing images and links from external domains, primarily A8.net. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The lack of security headers and unknown SSL status are technical risks. The site uses a proprietary tracking service (Research Artisan Pro) which may impact privacy compliance. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve security, SEO, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atimana.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atimana.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.