Skip to main content

Security report for atanas-panchev.com

Адвокат Атанас Панчев · Other · Bulgaria

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Адвокат Атанас Панчев is a Bulgarian legal professional offering specialized legal services primarily in civil law and related legal areas such as administrative, property, insurance, commercial, and tax law. The business operates as a small legal practice based in Sofia, Bulgaria, targeting both individual and corporate clients. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions and contact options, including a contact form protected by Google reCAPTCHA. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with Elementor and Rank Math SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security measures include HTTPS and cookie consent, but lack advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned for its local market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atanas-panchev.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the legal services sector with a focus on private law and corporate legal services. It leverages a professional website to attract clients in Sofia and surrounding regions. The business model is service-based, relying on consultations and legal representation. The absence of social media presence and limited marketing tools suggests a focus on direct client engagement rather than broad digital marketing. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the business founding year, supporting legitimacy. The company has authored publications, enhancing its professional credibility. Growth potential may be enhanced by expanding digital marketing and publishing more comprehensive policies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA integration on the contact form to prevent spam. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor risk for DNS spoofing. No incident response or security policy information is published, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. The cookie consent mechanism is well implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional technical controls and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Add incident response contact information and a security policy page to demonstrate preparedness and transparency.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Адвокат Атанас Панчев
Description
Адвокат Атанас Панчев е магистър по право със самостоятелна адвокатска практика, с дългогодишен опит, предлага юридически услуги и консултации в гр. София и региона. Профилиран е в частно-правни отношения от областта на гражданското право. Сфера на дейност: гражданско право, административно, вещно, застрахователно, облигационно, търговско и данъчно право. Предоставя пълна гама правни услуги за корпоративни клиенти. Специалист в авторското право. Автор на две книги, доктор по Културно-историческо наследство.
Key services
legal consultations, civil law, administrative law, property law, insurance law, obligations law, commercial law, tax law, corporate legal services, copyright law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Elementor, Rank Math SEO, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Maps embed
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal services site for a Bulgarian lawyer
  2. Content is in Bulgarian language
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories
  5. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. No social media links detected
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is not privacy protected
  9. Site uses WordPress with Elementor and Rank Math SEO plugin
  10. Site performance is moderate with minified CSS/JS
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder and Rank Math SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. The site uses minified CSS and JavaScript assets to improve load times, achieving moderate performance. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for spam protection on the contact form. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but the domain registrar is PDR Ltd. The site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, representing technical debt in security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small professional service website but has room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atanas-panchev.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atanas-panchev.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.