Skip to main content

Security report for ata.moe

Other · Iceland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ata.moe is a small, recently created personal or fan site dedicated to a character known as the raccoon girl. It primarily serves as an art showcase platform featuring works from various artists, with attribution links to their social media profiles. The site does not present commercial activities or business services and targets fans and art enthusiasts interested in this niche content. The domain is registered with privacy protection, consistent with the site's non-commercial nature and recent launch in December 2024. Technically, the site is built with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services but lacks DNSSEC and advanced security headers. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, it lacks privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security best practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers. From a security perspective, the site shows a low maturity level with no evident security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures. No tracking or analytics services are detected, which reduces privacy concerns but also indicates minimal data collection. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC reduces the overall security posture. No adult or explicit content is present, making the site safe for general audiences. Overall, the site scores moderately on content quality and technical implementation but poorly on security and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing contact and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ata.moe

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates in a niche creative/artistic domain with no clear commercial business model. It leverages social media platforms like Twitter and Bluesky to connect with artists and audiences. The lack of business information and contact details suggests it is a hobbyist or community-driven project rather than a formal business entity. The domain's privacy protection and recent registration align with this profile. There are no indications of partnerships, subsidiaries, or revenue streams. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its curated art content and community engagement through social media links.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with no HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The site does not collect user data via forms or analytics, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement capabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, but the site would benefit from standard security enhancements to protect visitors and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with proper SSL/TLS certificates and enforce HTTPS redirects.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  5. Provide clear contact information and consider adding a security.txt file for vulnerability reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is themed around 'the home of the raccoon girl™', showcasing artwork by various artists. It appears to be a personal or fan site dedicated to a character or mascot called the raccoon girl.
Key services
Art showcase, Artist promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  2. No contact information or forms present on the site.
  3. Site content is primarily artwork with attribution to various artists via social media links.
  4. No commercial or transactional elements detected.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  8. No signs of adult or explicit content.
  9. Site is accessible without WAF or security challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple tech stack with static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It relies on Cloudflare for DNS and possibly CDN services but does not leverage advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clean, minimalistic design. There is no evidence of performance optimization tools or accessibility enhancements beyond basic responsive design. The lack of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal technical complexity but also limits insights into user behavior. Opportunities exist to modernize the site with improved security configurations and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ata.moe. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ata.moe.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.