Skip to main content

Security report for asynclabs.co

Async Labs · Technology · Croatia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Async Labs is a Croatia-based digital agency specializing in software development, digital marketing, digital design, and blockchain development. Founded in 2020, the company targets businesses worldwide seeking innovative IT solutions and digital transformation. Their consultative approach and diverse service portfolio position them as a reliable partner for delivering effective digital products and marketing strategies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tracking tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses standard security headers, but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies and incident response information, which are areas for improvement. Overall, Async Labs presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with good business credibility but should enhance privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asynclabs.co

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Async Labs operates as an independent digital agency with a medium-sized team, serving global clients across various industries. Their competitive advantage lies in combining software development with digital marketing and design, enabling end-to-end digital solutions. The business model focuses on project-based and consultative services, targeting enterprises and startups needing custom IT solutions. The company maintains active social media channels and showcases client testimonials, reinforcing market credibility. Growth indicators include recent project showcases and continuous content updates. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting a standalone operation. Strategic partnerships or payment processors were not explicitly found in the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. However, the absence of published privacy and cookie policies, lack of incident response contacts, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicate gaps in compliance and transparency. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, incident response readiness, and regular third-party script audits to mitigate potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to improve security transparency.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security vulnerabilities and privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Async Labs
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Async Labs
Description
Async Labs is a digital agency dedicated to delivering efficient and effective digital projects, building innovative digital products, and growing businesses globally. They provide IT solutions with a consultative approach to meet brand vision and business goals.
Key services
Software & App Development, Digital Marketing, Digital Design, Blockchain Development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, Quora Pixel, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Barba.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Quora Pixel, Bing Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Quora Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional digital agency website with clear service offerings
  2. Good use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  3. Lacks visible privacy and cookie policies
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  5. Strong client testimonials and social media presence
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Barba.js for dynamic content and transitions. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Quora Pixel, indicating a sophisticated marketing infrastructure. The site uses Google Maps API for location services. Performance is moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical risks include potential privacy concerns due to extensive tracking and lack of visible cookie consent mechanisms. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and functional but could improve in privacy and accessibility aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asynclabs.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asynclabs.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.