Skip to main content

Security report for astur-straskov.cz

ASTUR Straškov a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASTUR Straškov a.s. is a medium-sized agricultural company based in the Czech Republic, specializing in both crop and livestock production. The company operates over 3,100 hectares of agricultural land and offers a range of services including mechanization and land leasing. The website reflects a well-established business with a history dating back to 2004 and a strong local presence supported by partnerships with reputable agricultural machinery and service providers. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies and frameworks, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. However, there are gaps in privacy and security policies, with no visible privacy policy or incident response information, and missing security headers. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some level of GDPR awareness. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching astur-straskov.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid market position in the regional agricultural sector, combining traditional farming with mechanized services. Its partnerships with well-known agricultural equipment brands enhance its operational capabilities and credibility. The business model focuses on integrated agricultural production and service provision, targeting landowners and local farmers. The website content and news updates demonstrate active community engagement and ongoing development. The absence of social media links suggests a focus on direct communication channels. The company appears stable with consistent branding and a clear value proposition in the agriculture industry.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS usage and basic input validation on forms, alongside a cookie consent mechanism. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces its security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the security posture would benefit from enhanced header implementation and transparency. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits the ability for external security researchers to report issues responsibly.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ASTUR Straškov a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ASTUR Straškov a.s.
Description
Akciová společnost zaměřená na rostlinnou a živočišnou výrobu, poskytující zemědělské služby v oblasti Polabské nížiny, s dlouhodobě dobrými výnosy a finančním zhodnocením. Výkrm skotu je hlavní oblastí živočišné výroby. Disponuje více než 3,100 ha zemědělské půdy.
Key services
Rostlinná výroba, Živočišná výroba, Mechanizace, Zemědělské služby, Pacht pozemků
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Inter Tight), Flickity carousel, jQuery (implied by bootstrap dropdown and modal), Bootstrap (implied by classes and modal structure)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Form input validation classes present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with user options.
  4. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  5. No social media links detected on the page.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  7. Technical implementation uses modern web standards and frameworks.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  9. Business is agriculture-focused with a medium-sized footprint and regional presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Bootstrap framework. It uses Google Fonts and Flickity for carousel functionality. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. There is no evidence of a CMS or hosting provider from the provided data. The technical implementation is solid but could be improved by adding SEO meta tags and accessibility enhancements. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but security header implementation is lacking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with astur-straskov.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review astur-straskov.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.