Skip to main content

Security report for astroselena.lv

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.astroselena.lv is a Russian-language platform dedicated to astrology, tarot, numerology, psychology, and related esoteric subjects. It offers news, forecasts, educational programs, and articles targeting individuals interested in self-development and mystical sciences. The site is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging Amazon CloudFront CDN for content delivery and uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. The technical infrastructure is moderately modern with good mobile optimization and basic SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or terms of service documentation. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, limiting domain trust assessment. Social media presence on Facebook, Pinterest, and YouTube supports legitimacy. Overall, the site is a small-scale niche content provider with a moderate trust level and room for improvement in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching astroselena.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche esoteric and astrology sector, targeting Russian-speaking audiences primarily in Latvia or nearby regions. Its business model centers on content publishing and educational offerings in astrology and related fields. The site maintains regular blog updates and social media engagement, indicating active community interaction. However, the absence of clear contact information and privacy policies may hinder trust and limit professional credibility. The company appears to be a small entity without visible parent or subsidiary relationships. Growth potential exists through enhanced compliance, clearer business information, and expanded digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, aligning with GDPR cookie requirements. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, and no security.txt file is found. The absence of privacy policy and terms of service pages represents a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly update third-party libraries and monitor for security patches to reduce risk of vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website focused on astrology, tarot, numerology, psychology, and related esoteric topics. Provides news, forecasts, educational programs, and articles primarily in Russian language.
Key services
Astrology forecasts, Tarot readings, Numerology, Psychology articles, Educational courses and programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, Mozlive, Cookiebar.js, ShareButtons.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
engaga.com (user engagement tracking)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
engaga.com
Marketing tools
shareButtons.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and in Russian language.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with language set to Russian.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media links to Facebook, Pinterest, and YouTube are present and appear legitimate.
  6. Website uses Mozello CMS platform and Amazon CloudFront CDN.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No explicit security incident response or data protection officer information found.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences interested in astrology and related topics.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Mozello CMS and Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring reliable content delivery. The tech stack includes jQuery 2.2.4 and several UI libraries like Fancybox3 and Bannerplay. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features such as skip links. SEO is basic with canonical links and meta viewport tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph metadata. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts and stylesheets loaded from CDN. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or server-side rendering. Technical debt appears manageable but modernization opportunities exist, especially in SEO and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with astroselena.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review astroselena.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.