The website 'Asseco Store' presents minimal visible content and appears to be a JavaScript-heavy single-page application with no accessible textual content in the provided HTML. The WHOIS lookup for the domain www.asseco-store.com returned no registration data, indicating the domain may not be registered or WHOIS data is hidden, which raises concerns about legitimacy and transparency. The site loads multiple third-party analytics scripts including Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity, and Maze Analytics, suggesting extensive user tracking without visible privacy or cookie policies. Security headers and SSL configuration details are not available from the data provided, limiting the assessment of security posture. Overall, the website lacks basic business and contact information, privacy compliance, and visible content, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
High
No SPF record found
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention asseco-store.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for asseco-store.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Due to the absence of business-related content, contact details, or company information on the website, it is difficult to ascertain the market positioning, business model, or target audience. The site title 'Asseco Store' suggests a commercial or e-commerce intent, but no products, services, or descriptions are present. The lack of WHOIS data further complicates verification of the business entity behind the domain. The presence of advanced analytics tools indicates an intent to monitor user behavior, possibly for marketing or product development purposes. No partnerships or related domains were identified from the content.
Security posture
The security posture of the website is weak based on the available data. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms raises privacy concerns. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The WHOIS data absence is a significant red flag, reducing domain trustworthiness. Overall, the site requires substantial improvements in security and privacy practices to meet industry standards.
Recommendations
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and user consent mechanisms.
Publish contact information including business address, phone numbers, and security incident response contacts.
Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
Ensure WHOIS domain registration data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
Amplitude Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Maze Analytics
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
30/100
Analytics and tracking
Services
Amplitude Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Maze Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Amplitude Analytics, Maze Analytics
Marketing tools
Amplitude Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Maze Analytics
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website content is minimal and mostly JavaScript-driven with no visible textual content in the HTML source.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
No contact information or forms detected in the HTML content.
Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts are loaded, indicating extensive user tracking.
No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
WHOIS data is missing or domain is not registered according to the raw WHOIS output.
No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built using Angular framework and loads multiple analytics scripts including Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity, and Maze Analytics. The HTML content is minimal and relies heavily on JavaScript for rendering, which may impact SEO and accessibility negatively. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the source. Performance appears moderate but cannot be fully assessed without live testing. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no explicit features detected. The lack of meta tags beyond basic viewport and charset limits SEO effectiveness. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but incomplete in terms of content delivery and compliance.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with asseco-store.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asseco-store.com.