Skip to main content

Security report for assaabloyentrance.com

ASSA ABLOY · Manufacturing · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASSA ABLOY Entrance Systems is a global enterprise specializing in manufacturing and supplying advanced entrance solutions including automatic, commercial, industrial, and digital doors. The company positions itself as a leader in secure and efficient access solutions, targeting businesses and industries requiring high-quality entrance systems. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a professional design and comprehensive product information, supporting its market leadership claims. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and a proprietary CMS platform, with good SEO and mobile optimization. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical security weakness, exposing users to potential risks. Security headers are well implemented, but the absence of encryption and privacy policies reduces trust and compliance. Overall, the site demonstrates strong business credibility but requires urgent security improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching assaabloyentrance.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
95
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on entrance systems for various industries including commercial, industrial, and transportation. Its business model centers on product innovation and global distribution, supported by a strong brand and extensive product portfolio. The website's multilingual support and detailed product descriptions indicate a broad international market reach. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies on the site suggests areas for improvement in customer engagement and compliance transparency. The use of advanced tracking and marketing tools reflects a mature digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website implements several security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, indicating awareness of security best practices. However, the complete lack of HTTPS and valid SSL/TLS certificates is a major vulnerability, severely impacting user trust and data protection. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site does not use OCSP stapling or session resumption, and TLS protocols are disabled, further weakening security. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS configuration is critical to improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and enforce TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  5. Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support.
  6. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file.
  7. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  8. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities.
  9. Enhance accessibility features and provide comprehensive SEO metadata.
  10. Establish and communicate incident response procedures and security policies publicly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the OneCMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript and CSS frameworks. It employs JSON-LD structured data and Open Graph tags for SEO and social media integration. The site is hosted on AWS infrastructure, inferred from IP and CSP report URIs. Performance data is unavailable, but the site includes responsive design elements and preloads images for optimization. The absence of SSL/TLS is a significant technical debt. The site uses multiple tracking and analytics services including Google Analytics 4 and Matomo, integrated via JavaScript. The technical implementation is solid but requires urgent security upgrades and better privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with assaabloyentrance.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review assaabloyentrance.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.