Skip to main content

Security report for aspinalls-club.com

Online Casino UK · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Online Casino UK operates a niche affiliate website focused on Non GamStop Casinos, targeting UK players seeking unrestricted online gambling options. The site provides detailed casino reviews, bonus offers, and payment method guides, positioning itself as a resource for adult gamblers outside the UK GamStop scheme. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Astra theme and Yoast SEO, showing good SEO and mobile optimization but lacking privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and DNSSEC. The domain WHOIS data shows recent registration with some inconsistencies in registrant information, slightly impacting trust. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aspinalls-club.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a specialized segment of the online gambling market, focusing on non-GamStop casinos which appeal to players seeking fewer restrictions. Its business model relies on affiliate marketing, generating revenue through casino referrals. The content is well-structured and informative, catering to experienced gamblers with detailed payment and game information. The lack of direct company contact details and privacy policies may limit trust and regulatory compliance. The site uses third-party analytics and affiliate tracking, indicating a mature marketing approach. Growth potential exists in expanding compliance transparency and security measures to build greater user confidence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, but lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no contact channels for security issues are listed. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and incident response channels.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and affiliate links for security and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Online Casino UK
Description
Online Casino UK provides curated information and reviews about Non GamStop Casinos, focusing on online gambling platforms outside the UK GamStop self-exclusion scheme. The site offers detailed casino reviews, bonus offers, payment methods, and gaming options for UK players seeking unrestricted gaming experiences.
Key services
Casino reviews, Bonus offers, Payment method guides, Gaming information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Astra theme, Cloudflare DNS, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Clicky
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Clicky
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided
  4. Site uses affiliate marketing model focused on non-GamStop casinos
  5. Good use of structured data and SEO metadata
  6. Moderate security posture with room for improvement in headers and compliance
  7. Content is gambling-related, targeting adult UK audience
  8. Use of third-party analytics (Clicky) for tracking
  9. Domain WHOIS data shows some inconsistencies and recent registration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Astra theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a standard and well-supported infrastructure. The use of Cloudflare DNS suggests some level of DNS management but no WAF or security challenge is detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata. Accessibility is basic but present. The site uses JavaScript for analytics and affiliate tracking. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement privacy compliance features to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aspinalls-club.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aspinalls-club.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.