Skip to main content

Security report for asosservices.com

Asos · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at test.asosservices.com is a non-production test environment for Asos, a known e-commerce brand. The site serves internal or development purposes and does not provide public-facing business content or services. The technical infrastructure is based on modern web technologies including React and Akamai mPulse for performance monitoring, indicating a mature digital setup for internal testing. However, the site lacks public business information, privacy policies, and contact details, reflecting its non-production nature. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers and no visible HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable for the subdomain, consistent with internal use. Overall, the site poses low risk but also offers limited trust signals for external users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asosservices.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
80
Email security
40
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

As a non-production environment, the site does not engage in commercial activities or customer interactions. It is part of Asos's internal infrastructure, likely used for testing new features or services before production deployment. There are no indications of revenue streams, partnerships, or customer engagement on this site. The lack of public policies and contact information aligns with its internal use case. The site’s branding is consistent with Asos, but content is minimal and targeted at internal stakeholders such as developers or testers.

Security posture

The security maturity of this environment is low from a public perspective. No security headers are present, and there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement in the HTML content. The site does not expose sensitive data or forms, reducing immediate risk. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations if this were a public site. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are also missing. Given its internal test nature, these gaps may be acceptable but should be addressed before any public deployment.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all traffic.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations when moving to production.
  4. Include contact and incident response information for transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct a security review before promoting this environment to production to ensure compliance and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asos
Description
This is a non-production test environment for Asos services, likely used internally or for development/testing purposes. It does not provide public-facing business content or services.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Webpack, BOOMR (Akamai mPulse), CSS
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Akamai mPulse
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Akamai mPulse
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-production test environment with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided.
  4. No security headers detected in the HTML source.
  5. Uses React and Akamai mPulse for performance monitoring.
  6. No external business-related links except Akamai analytics domains.
  7. No signs of adult or explicit content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable for subdomain; domain likely internal.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses React as its primary front-end framework, bundled with Webpack. Performance monitoring is integrated via Akamai mPulse, indicating a focus on performance metrics. The site is hosted behind Akamai CDN infrastructure. The HTML content is minimal and lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. No CMS is detected. The site appears to be mobile responsive at a basic level. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries in the provided scripts. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but minimal, consistent with a test environment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asosservices.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asosservices.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.