Skip to main content

Security report for asketic.com

asketic · Other · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asketic is a specialized branding agency focused on delivering brand design services to high-stakes businesses. Their offerings include brand strategy, naming, design direction, visual identity, and a broad range of creative services tailored to elevate or create new brands. The company targets businesses seeking professional branding solutions and positions itself as a niche player in the branding and creative services market. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern technologies such as Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and Stripe for payment processing. From a technical perspective, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with good performance and SEO optimization. The use of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicates attention to privacy compliance, particularly GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incident response policies suggests room for improvement in security posture. The WHOIS data is notably missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks published security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the site presents a moderate to good security posture but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security best practices. The overall risk is moderate due to the missing WHOIS data and lack of explicit security policies. Strategic recommendations include improving domain registration transparency, adding security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and maintaining strong privacy compliance to enhance trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asketic.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Asketic operates as a small, specialized branding agency serving diverse industries including design, digital services, fashion, finance, food, health, industrials, lifestyle, government, retail, and technology sectors. Their business model revolves around providing comprehensive branding and design services, leveraging a strong online presence and social media engagement. The company appears to have a focused target market of businesses requiring high-quality brand development and upgrades. The website content and service offerings suggest a well-defined competitive advantage in creative branding solutions. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts and creative projects. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with payment processors like Stripe and content delivery via Vimeo. Growth indicators include active social media channels and a broad service portfolio. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved domain registration transparency and enhanced security disclosures to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file further constrains responsible vulnerability management. Compliance gaps exist in formalizing security governance and incident response readiness. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for strategic improvements to elevate trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Publish complete WHOIS registration data or ensure domain registration transparency to improve legitimacy and trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy compliance mechanisms and cookie consent to align with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
asketic
Description
Asketic provides branding services for high-stakes businesses, focusing on creating new brands or upgrading existing brands to a higher level.
Key services
Brand Strategy, Naming, Design Direction, Visual Identity, Brand Guidelines, Communication Materials, Design Systems, Packaging Design, Signage & Environmental Graphics, 3D Visuals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Stripe, Vimeo Player, Finsweet Attributes, CodeCrumbs
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure forms with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional branding and consistent design throughout the site.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with granular controls.
  4. No explicit terms of service page found.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  6. Multiple social media channels linked, indicating active online presence.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and third-party services like Stripe and Vimeo.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies and integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Vimeo for video content, and Stripe for payment processing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed achievable through optimization of third-party scripts and assets. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though the absence of security headers and explicit security policies indicates technical debt in security hardening. Opportunities exist to enhance technical robustness by adopting security best practices and improving transparency around domain registration and security governance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asketic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asketic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.