Skip to main content

Security report for asianajajat.fi

Suomen Asianajajat – Finlands Advokater – Finnish Bar Association · Government · Finland

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Suomen Asianajajat is the Finnish Bar Association, a professional and regulatory body overseeing lawyers in Finland. The organization focuses on maintaining high standards in legal services, providing education and training, and participating in legislative development. The website serves as an authoritative resource for legal professionals and the public, offering information about regulation, membership, legal aid, and professional development. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and a LiteSpeed server, supporting multilingual content and SEO best practices. However, the security posture is weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which poses a significant risk to user data confidentiality and trust. While privacy and cookie policies are present, the lack of a consent mechanism is a compliance gap. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich but requires urgent security improvements to protect visitors and maintain credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asianajajat.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
35
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Finnish Bar Association holds a strong market position as the official regulator and supporter of lawyers in Finland. Its business model revolves around membership services, professional education, and regulatory oversight. The association targets legal professionals and individuals seeking legal assistance. Partnerships with related service providers enhance its ecosystem. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content and active social media engagement. Growth indicators include ongoing educational events and professional examinations. The organization operates in the government and non-profit sectors, with a medium-sized operational scale. Strategic observations suggest a focus on digital transformation and enhanced user engagement, though security infrastructure needs modernization.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to critical SSL/TLS deficiencies. The lack of a valid certificate and disabled TLS protocols expose the site to interception and trust issues. Minimal security headers are present, with HSTS configured but without subdomain inclusion or preload. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating limited transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through privacy policies but lacks explicit consent mechanisms. The site does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, which is positive. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with significant room for improvement to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to secure all communications.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) to ensure secure connections.
  3. Implement a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a well-established CMS (WordPress) with a modern theme and plugins, including Yoast SEO and WPML for multilingual support. Hosting is provided by SoftAvenue with LiteSpeed caching for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. However, performance metrics are unavailable, and SSL/TLS configuration is critically lacking, which undermines overall technical robustness. The site uses common JavaScript libraries like jQuery and FontAwesome. There is no evidence of broken elements or errors in the HTML content. Technical debt appears low, but modernization of security infrastructure is urgently needed to mitigate risks and improve user confidence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asianajajat.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asianajajat.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.