Skip to main content

Security report for asgard.pl

Asgard Sp. z o.o. · Other · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asgard Sp. z o.o. is a well-established Polish company specializing in the import and distribution of promotional gifts, serving advertising agencies across more than 30 countries. Their product range spans from popular pens to premium-class gadgets, supported by an online ordering platform named BLUE COLLECTION. The company has a solid market presence with over 32 years of experience and a medium-sized workforce. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and Bootstrap, featuring modern web technologies and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks some advanced security headers and a formal incident response policy. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy business with a good digital maturity level.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asgard.pl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets advertising agencies and distributors, providing a comprehensive product catalog and marking services. Their business model includes direct import and distribution, supported by a digital platform for ordering and managing client accounts. The presence of awards, ethical codes, and social media engagement indicates a mature and reputable market position. The company operates primarily in Poland but serves a global client base. Growth indicators include a large number of monthly marked products and a stable employee base. Partnerships include the BLUE COLLECTION platform, enhancing their service offering.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot measures via Google reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of DNSSEC reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The company should consider enhancing security policies and publishing incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit third-party libraries and plugins to ensure no vulnerabilities are present.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Asgard Sp. z o.o.
Registration number
KRS: 0000110082
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asgard Sp. z o.o.
Description
Asgard is a direct importer of promotional gifts, offering a wide range of products from popular pens to premium class gadgets. They serve modern advertising agencies with products including electronics and premium gifts.
Key services
Product marking section, Warehouse and logistics, Online ordering platform (BLUE COLLECTION), Customer support and distributor services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Font Awesome, Swiper, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear business focus on promotional gifts and distributor services.
  3. Good presence of contact information and legal disclosures.
  4. No critical security issues detected.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented.
  6. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business continuity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and popular CMS (WordPress) with Elementor page builder and Bootstrap framework, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. JavaScript libraries like jQuery, Swiper, and Owl Carousel enhance interactivity. Google reCAPTCHA is used for bot protection on forms. Performance is moderate, with optimized CSS and lazy loading images. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but the site is served over HTTPS with a valid certificate. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asgard.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asgard.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.