Skip to main content

Security report for asfridman.com

SIA "Amadeuss" · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the official online presence of Aleksandr Fridman, an expert and methodologist in regular management, offering consulting, training, and professional exploitation of personnel services primarily targeting Russian-speaking business leaders. The business operates with a small company entity based in Latvia, with a history dating back to 2011. The site provides comprehensive information about upcoming events, books, and online consultations, supported by detailed contact information and active social media channels. Technically, the site is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and multiple analytics and retargeting tools, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and form validation, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, slightly impacting trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional, well-structured, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a credible resource for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asfridman.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aleksandr Fridman positions himself as a niche expert in regular management consulting and training, targeting managers and business leaders in Russian-speaking markets. The business model includes direct consulting, training sessions, book sales, and online consultations, supported by a consistent brand presence and active social media engagement. The partnership with event platforms and book retailers like Ozon enhances market reach. The company operates as a small entity based in Latvia, with a focused sector in management consulting. The website's content and marketing tools suggest a strategy aimed at building thought leadership and client acquisition through digital channels. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a notable risk factor but does not currently undermine the operational business model.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and secure form validation, indicating a baseline security posture. Multiple tracking and retargeting pixels are used extensively, which may raise privacy concerns if not managed properly. The presence of cookie consent and privacy policies demonstrates GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of security headers and explicit security or incident response policies indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy but does not directly impact technical security. Overall, the security posture is moderate with recommendations to enhance header implementation and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party tracking and marketing scripts to minimize privacy risks and potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with best practices and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Amadeuss"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Amadeuss"
Description
Александр Фридман, эксперт и методолог по регулярному менеджменту: регулярный менеджмент и профессиональная эксплутация персонала: обучение руководителей, консалтинг
Key services
Training for managers, Consulting, Online consultations, Book sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, VK Retargeting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure form with validation
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, VK Retargeting
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, VK Retargeting, Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, VK Retargeting
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Russian language
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Multiple social media and external links consistent with business profile
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present with consent mechanism
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  6. Contact information is detailed and includes email, phone, physical address, and contact form
  7. Use of multiple tracking and retargeting pixels indicates extensive user tracking
  8. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  9. Website uses Webflow CMS and modern JavaScript libraries
  10. Good mobile optimization and SEO practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including jQuery and various analytics and marketing scripts such as Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and VK Retargeting. The site loads asynchronously many external scripts for tracking and advertising purposes, which may impact performance but is typical for marketing-focused sites. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. The site uses Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit for typography. Form validation is implemented via jQuery Validate plugin. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and adequate for the business needs, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asfridman.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asfridman.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.