Skip to main content

Security report for artofzoo.name

ADMIN · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ArtOfZoo.Name operates as a niche adult content website specializing in bestiality pornography, offering downloadable videos and images featuring animal sexual acts. The site targets an adults-only audience interested in this illegal and highly controversial content. The business model revolves around content distribution and affiliate marketing through partner sites. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins like Yoast SEO and uses jQuery for frontend interactions. The site has basic design and navigation, with moderate SEO optimization but lacks advanced mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is weak, with no detected security headers and no privacy or cookie policies, exposing the site to compliance risks. The domain registration is standard but lacks transparency, and the site links extensively to other suspicious and adult content domains. Overall, the site presents significant legal and ethical risks and lacks professional business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching artofzoo.name

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention artofzoo.name, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for artofzoo.name right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market in adult entertainment focusing on bestiality, a category illegal in many jurisdictions. It leverages affiliate partnerships with similar adult content sites to drive traffic and monetize. The lack of clear business entity information and absence of compliance documentation suggests an informal or underground operation. The target customer segment is adults seeking extreme adult content. Growth indicators are unclear, but the site maintains frequent content updates. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple related adult and extreme content domains, some with highly questionable content such as rape and snuff. Strategic observations highlight the site's reliance on affiliate marketing and content aggregation rather than original production.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low. There is no evidence of standard security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, and no visible incident response or security contact information. The site uses HTTPS, which is a positive baseline. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The presence of adult illegal content increases the risk profile significantly. No known vulnerabilities or malware were detected from the provided data, but the use of outdated or unpatched WordPress plugins cannot be ruled out. Incident response readiness appears minimal, with only a generic contact form available. Overall, the site is vulnerable to legal takedown and security threats.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve security posture.
  3. Establish clear incident response contacts and procedures, including abuse and security email addresses.
  4. Conduct a security audit of WordPress plugins and update all software components regularly.
  5. Review legal compliance of hosted content and consider removing illegal material to reduce risk.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ADMIN
Description
Art Of Zoo Sex - Site For Animal Porn Lovers! Mega Collection of Hot Bestiality Porn Videos and Animal Sex Pictures for Download.
Key services
downloadable bestiality porn videos, animal sex pictures, content updates and collections
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin v25.4, jQuery 3.7.1, PHP (implied by WordPress), CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
LiveInternet
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LiveInternet counter
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts illegal adult content involving animals (bestiality).
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact only via a contact form; no emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. Multiple external links to other adult and suspicious sites including rape and snuff content.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security measures.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin.
  7. No GDPR or data protection compliance indicators.
  8. Content and business model are niche and illegal in many jurisdictions.
  9. No social media or professional business presence detected.
  10. Website design and navigation are basic and not professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a standard WordPress CMS platform with Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. It uses jQuery for frontend scripting and standard CSS for styling. The site loads multiple external resources including images and scripts from partner and affiliate domains. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization techniques detected. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tags present but no advanced responsive design features. Accessibility features are minimal, with some semantic HTML but no ARIA landmarks or enhanced accessibility aids. SEO is supported by Yoast plugin and meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and lack of security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with artofzoo.name. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review artofzoo.name.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.