Skip to main content

Security report for artfocus.cz

ArtFocus · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ArtFocus is a small Czech graphic and web design studio based in Prague, offering a range of services including graphic design, web development, SEO optimization, PPC campaign management, and print advertising. The company targets local businesses and individuals seeking professional online and offline communication solutions. The website is professionally designed with a focus on showcasing portfolio references and service offerings, primarily in the Czech language. Technically, the site uses classic JavaScript libraries such as Prototype.js and Scriptaculous, along with Lightbox for image galleries, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Crazy Egg, and Seznam Retargeting. However, mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and performance is moderate. Security posture is average with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and privacy policies, which impacts compliance and trust. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and contact details support legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and business-focused but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of artfocus.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching artfocus.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ArtFocus operates in a competitive local market providing essential graphic and web design services with a strong emphasis on SEO and online marketing. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting SMEs and local clients in Prague and Plzeň. The company leverages a portfolio of references to build trust and attract clients. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts for web design, e-shop creation, SEO, PPC management, and print advertising. The presence of multiple tracking and retargeting tools indicates a focus on digital marketing effectiveness. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent small business. Growth potential may be enhanced by improving digital maturity, mobile responsiveness, and compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page reduces transparency and incident response readiness. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance site security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO performance.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ArtFocus
Description
Grafické studio v Praze, tvorba profesionálních www stránek, SEO - optimalizace pro vyhledávače, tvorba e-shopů, grafické návrhy reklamních polepů aut a tiskovin, CI.
Key services
Graphic design and DTP, Web design and development, SEO optimization, PPC campaign management, E-shop creation, Advertising and print materials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Prototype.js, Scriptaculous, Lightbox, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, ClickHeat, Seznam Retargeting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by script sources using https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Crazy Egg, ClickHeat
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick, Seznam Retargeting
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Crazy Egg, ClickHeat
Marketing tools
Crazy Egg, ClickHeat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. Contact information is present but no physical address found
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust
  5. Use of multiple tracking and advertising scripts indicates marketing focus
  6. Website content is in Czech language targeting local Czech market
  7. No security headers detected in provided data, potential security improvement area
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries (Prototype.js, Scriptaculous) alongside Lightbox for image display, indicating a somewhat dated tech stack. Integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Crazy Egg, and Seznam Retargeting shows a focus on user behavior tracking and advertising effectiveness. The site structure is table and absolute-position based, which may hinder responsiveness and accessibility. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No modern CMS or frameworks detected. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Technical debt is present due to older technologies and lack of modern security practices, which could impact scalability and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with artfocus.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review artfocus.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.