Skip to main content

Security report for armslist.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at armslist.com is currently inaccessible, returning a minimal 404 error page with no substantive content. This prevents any meaningful analysis of the site's business offerings, technical infrastructure, or security posture. The domain is registered since 2008 with NameCheap and uses Cloudflare nameservers, indicating some level of protection or content delivery network usage. However, the lack of accessible content and metadata severely limits the ability to assess the company's market position, services, or compliance status. Security posture cannot be evaluated due to missing data, but the presence of Cloudflare suggests some baseline protection. Overall, the site appears to be down, blocked, or under maintenance, resulting in a critical risk for users and stakeholders due to lack of transparency and information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching armslist.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Email security
98
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible website content, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain age and registrar information suggest an established entity, but no data on market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The business sector is undetermined beyond 'Other', and no contact or corporate information is present to validate operations or credibility.

Security posture

Security analysis is severely limited by the lack of accessible content and headers. The domain uses Cloudflare nameservers, which may provide some protection such as DDoS mitigation and WAF capabilities. However, no security headers, policies, or incident response contacts are found. The absence of HTTPS information and security best practices is a critical gap. No vulnerability disclosures or certifications are present. The overall security posture is unknown but likely poor due to lack of transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Restore website content to enable proper analysis and user access.
  2. Implement and verify HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies.
  4. Add clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Minimal HTML content with '404' and Cloudflare nameservers indicate possible Cloudflare WAF or blocking. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible, returning a 404 error with minimal HTML content.
  2. No metadata, Open Graph tags, JSON-LD structured data, forms, or contact information found.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. No scripts, libraries, or technologies detected from the HTML content.
  6. Domain is registered with NameCheap and uses Cloudflare nameservers, indicating Cloudflare protection.
  7. No external links or social media links found in the content.
  8. Website appears to be down, blocked, or under maintenance.
  9. Analysis is incomplete due to blocked or missing content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal 404 error page with no metadata, scripts, or structured data. The domain is hosted behind Cloudflare, which may provide CDN and security services. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. The lack of content and technical data indicates either a site outage, blocking by WAF, or removal of content. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed. Technical modernization and restoration of content are necessary for operational viability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with armslist.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review armslist.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.