Skip to main content

Security report for ariogalosgrudai.lt

UAB „Ariogalos grūdai“ · Manufacturing · Lithuania

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB „Ariogalos grūdai“ is a Lithuanian company specializing in grain purchasing and animal feed production, serving primarily poultry farming complexes within Lithuania. The company positions itself as a reliable partner with a focus on high-quality services and modern feed raw materials. The website reflects a small-sized manufacturing business with a clear local market focus and multiple national awards that enhance its credibility. Technically, the website is built on the Site.pro platform, uses modern web standards, and is mobile optimized, though performance is moderate. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Contact information is clearly presented, but no privacy or cookie policies are available, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ariogalosgrudai.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the agricultural manufacturing sector, focusing on grain procurement and feed production for poultry farms. Its business model is B2B, targeting Lithuanian agricultural producers and poultry complexes. The company has established market presence since 2017 and has received multiple national recognitions, indicating competitive strength and quality. The website content and structured data reinforce the company’s local focus and service offerings. There is no evidence of international subsidiaries or parent companies. The business appears stable with a clear growth trajectory and a focus on service quality and modernization.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. No forms or inputs on the homepage reduce attack surface, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance issues. No tracking or analytics scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user data collection. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet broader compliance and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB „Ariogalos grūdai“
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB „Ariogalos grūdai“
Description
UAB „Ariogalos grūdai“ is a reliable Lithuanian company engaged in grain purchasing and feed production. They provide high-quality services and supply Lithuanian poultry farming complexes with modern feed raw materials. Their vision is to become a trusted partner in purchasing and processing Lithuanian grains and feed raw materials, distinguished by high service quality. Their mission is to supply grains and feed raw materials to poultry farming complexes with the most modern compound feed factory in Ariogala.
Key services
Grain purchasing, Animal feed production and sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Site.pro Website builder
Platforms
Site.pro CMS/platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent across multiple locations.
  4. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the homepage.
  5. Use of Site.pro website builder platform is evident.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. Multiple national awards and recognitions are prominently displayed, enhancing trust.
  8. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  9. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Site.pro website builder platform, leveraging standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It uses Google Fonts for typography and includes video background elements for visual appeal. The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure with multiple internal links. Performance is moderate, likely due to video backgrounds and multiple CSS/JS bundles. No advanced frameworks or CMS beyond Site.pro are detected. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal technical tracking. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses canonical URLs and meta tags for SEO, contributing to good search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ariogalosgrudai.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ariogalosgrudai.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.