Skip to main content

Security report for arcticportal.org

Arctic Portal · Government · Iceland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Arctic Portal is a well-established non-profit gateway providing comprehensive information, data sharing, and consultation services related to the Arctic region. The website offers news, maps, scientific data, governance information, educational resources, and event calendars targeting researchers, policymakers, educators, and Arctic stakeholders. The organization is based in Iceland and has been operational since 2005, positioning itself as a trusted source in the Arctic domain. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome. It is hosted with domain registration via GoDaddy and DNS managed by Cloudflare. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Google Analytics is used for user behavior tracking, including scroll and download events, indicating moderate user tracking practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs domain status locks to protect domain integrity. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected, which are areas for improvement. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could impact trust and security readiness. Overall, Arctic Portal demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with a strong reputation in its niche. To enhance security posture and regulatory compliance, it should implement DNSSEC, security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and publish incident response contacts. These steps will improve trustworthiness and align with best practices for data protection and user privacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arcticportal.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Arctic Portal operates as a specialized non-profit entity focusing on Arctic-related information dissemination and community engagement. Its market positioning is strong within the Arctic research and governance ecosystem, supported by partnerships and references to related Arctic organizations and events. The business model centers on providing free access to data, news, and educational content, funded partially through donations. The target audience includes academic researchers, government agencies, indigenous communities, and environmental stakeholders. The website's longevity since 2005 and active content updates indicate sustained relevance and growth potential. The partnership ecosystem includes Arctic research institutes, international Arctic governance bodies, and educational organizations, enhancing its credibility and reach.

Security posture

The website maintains a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduce its defense-in-depth capabilities. No published security policy or incident response contacts limit transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of email cloaking helps reduce spam risks. Google Analytics tracking is implemented with moderate user data collection but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms, posing privacy compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for informational content but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS infrastructure and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy with dedicated security contact channels.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Arctic Portal
Description
Arctic Portal is a gateway to the arctic and grants exposure to arctic related information. It aims to engage in data sharing and consultation.
Key services
Arctic news and announcements, Map gallery and interactive mapping systems, Science and data portals, Governance and policy information, Educational resources, Event calendar, Donations and funding support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections
  • Email address cloaking to prevent spam

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established Arctic information portal with comprehensive content on Arctic science, governance, and community.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address in Iceland.
  4. Uses Joomla CMS with modern frontend libraries like Bootstrap and Font Awesome.
  5. Google Analytics is used with moderate user tracking including scroll and download events.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. Social media presence is strong with official accounts on YouTube, Facebook, Twitter (X), LinkedIn, and Instagram.
  10. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery for responsive design and interactivity. Font Awesome provides iconography. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking, including advanced events like scroll depth and file downloads. The site is hosted with domain registration through GoDaddy and DNS managed by Cloudflare, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. Accessibility features are basic but functional. The site uses email cloaking scripts to protect contact emails. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or headless CMS usage, indicating a traditional web architecture. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and enhance privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arcticportal.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arcticportal.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.