Skip to main content

Security report for arcmember.se

arcMember · Other · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

arcMember is a Swedish-based company providing a web-based membership management system tailored for small to large organizations and associations. The platform offers comprehensive yet user-friendly tools for member registration, event management, donation handling, and related administrative tasks. The website positions arcMember as a leading solution in the non-profit and membership organization sector in Sweden, supported by client testimonials and a broad client base. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, lazy loading, and Google Analytics for performance and user insights. The site is well-structured with good SEO practices and mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy page. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with clear contact information and active social media presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arcmember.se

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

arcMember operates in the SaaS market for membership management, targeting non-profit organizations, associations, and clubs primarily in Sweden. Their business model revolves around subscription-based software services with tiered pricing packages. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through client references, including notable organizations. Revenue streams likely include software licenses, support, and customization services. The company maintains a visible partnership ecosystem through client logos but no explicit partner domains. Growth indicators include frequent product updates and active customer engagement. Strategic observations suggest a focus on flexibility and ease of use to differentiate from competitors.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which could improve transparency and trust. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via cookie consent but lacks a detailed privacy policy. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible on the site.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
arcMember
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
arcMember
Description
arcMember är ett webbaserat medlemssystem för komplett men ändå lättanvänd hantering av medlemmar för såväl mindre föreningar som större riksorganisationer.
Key services
Medlemsregister, Medlemssystem, Medlemsportal, Gåvohantering, Administration av medlemskap, Stipendiehantering, Instrumentförsäkring kopplat till medlemmar
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Flickity (carousel), FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Lazy loading images
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by og:url https://arcmember.se/)
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed explanation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented in Swedish with English language tag
  3. No explicit privacy policy page found, but cookie consent is implemented
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address
  5. Social media presence is active on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube
  6. Multiple customer testimonials and client logos enhance trust
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and lazy loading for performance
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information
  9. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  10. SEO and meta tags are well implemented with Open Graph and Twitter cards
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including JavaScript libraries such as Flickity for carousels, FontAwesome for icons, and Google Fonts for typography. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. The site employs lazy loading for images to optimize performance and is mobile responsive. The HTML is well-structured with appropriate meta tags for SEO and social media sharing. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by adopting stronger security practices and enhancing privacy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arcmember.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arcmember.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.