Skip to main content

Security report for archeoparkchotebuz.cz

Archeopark Chotěbuz-Podobora · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Archeopark Chotěbuz-Podobora is a cultural and archaeological site in the Czech Republic, offering educational and family-oriented experiences centered on prehistoric and early medieval history. The website serves as an official portal providing information about the park, events, exhibitions, and visitor information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern front-end technologies like Bootstrap and jQuery, delivering a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, though lacking some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification but the site’s content and partner affiliations support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-positioned as a regional cultural attraction with good digital maturity but could improve security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching archeoparkchotebuz.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Archeopark operates as a small cultural institution focused on heritage education and tourism. Its business model revolves around visitor services including guided tours, educational programs for schools, family activities, and special events. The park collaborates with regional museums and development programs, enhancing its credibility and reach. The website targets families, schools, and tourists interested in history and archaeology. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, event participation, and possibly rentals (e.g., bike rental). The partnership ecosystem includes local museums and regional development agencies, indicating strong community integration. Growth potential lies in expanding educational offerings and digital engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The site does not implement a cookie consent mechanism, which may be a compliance risk under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing contact details for a Data Protection Officer or security contact to enhance trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Archeopark Chotěbuz-Podobora
Description
Archeopark Chotěbuz-Podobora is an archaeological site representing one of the most significant prehistoric and early medieval monuments in the Těšín Silesia region. It features remains of bicultural settlements from the late Bronze Age and Hallstatt period, including a prehistoric settlement and a well-fortified early medieval Slavic fortification reconstructed in the park area.
Key services
Guided tours, Educational programs for schools, Family-oriented activities, Events and exhibitions, Bike rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Cycle2 carousel, Magnific Popup, WordPress, qTranslate-XT
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure scripts and libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
AddThis
Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  4. Privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant but no cookie consent banner found.
  5. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; SSL is properly configured.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress) with common plugins.
  8. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
  9. Social media presence via Facebook is integrated.
  10. Partner logos and links indicate collaboration with regional cultural organizations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a Bootstrap-based theme and several JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Cycle2 carousel, and Magnific Popup. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible in script loading and caching. No hosting provider information is directly available. The site integrates social media via Facebook and uses Google Tag Manager and AddThis for analytics and sharing. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the HTML source. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for the site's purpose but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with archeoparkchotebuz.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review archeoparkchotebuz.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.