Arbonia Riesa GmbH operates a multilingual corporate website targeting primarily German-speaking countries and Russia, presenting itself as a solutions provider likely in an industrial or manufacturing sector. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and provides clear contact information and social media presence, supporting moderate business credibility. Technically, the site employs modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating a reasonable level of digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is moderate with some best practices observed, but lacks visible security headers and a published privacy policy, which are critical for compliance and trust. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and does not contain any adult or questionable content.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
95
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention arbonia-solutions.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for arbonia-solutions.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company appears to be a medium-sized entity operating in the 'Other' sector, likely industrial solutions, with a focus on B2B markets in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, and Russia. The multilingual approach suggests an international market presence. The lack of detailed business descriptions or certifications limits deeper insights into market positioning or competitive advantages. The presence of official contact points and social media channels supports a credible business ecosystem. No related or partner domains were identified from the data provided.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The use of a consent management platform and default denial of ad and analytics storage indicate GDPR awareness. However, the absence of security headers and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies highlight gaps in security maturity. The missing WHOIS data further complicates trust verification. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content.
Recommendations
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Obtain and maintain proper WHOIS registration data to enhance domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Arbonia Riesa GmbH
Description
Arbonia Riesa GmbH is a company presenting itself with a multilingual website targeting Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Russia, and other countries. The business appears to be focused on providing solutions, likely in manufacturing or industrial sectors given the company name and branding, but no explicit business description is provided on the landing page.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management Platform, Web fonts from fonts.net
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
Use of Google Tag Manager with consent defaults denying ad and analytics storage
Implementation of Usercentrics CMP for GDPR compliance
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Ad networks
Google Tag Manager
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management Platform
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
No WHOIS data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or WHOIS privacy
Website uses modern consent management and analytics tools
No privacy policy or terms of service found on landing page
Contact information is provided via structured data with emails and phone numbers
No forms detected on the landing page
Social media presence is linked and consistent with company branding
No security headers detected in provided data
No explicit security or incident response policies found
Content is business-oriented and safe for general audiences
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses modern JavaScript libraries and consent management tools, including Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics CMP, indicating a contemporary technical stack. Fonts are loaded from a CDN, and the site is optimized for mobile with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate based on preload hints and asynchronous script loading. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the data. The site lacks visible security headers, which is a technical risk. Overall, the infrastructure appears stable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more detailed metadata for SEO.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with arbonia-solutions.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arbonia-solutions.com.