Skip to main content

Security report for arbitration.lv

Baltijas Starptautiskā šķīrējtiesa · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltijas Starptautiskā šķīrējtiesa is a non-governmental, independent arbitration institution based in Latvia, providing civil dispute resolution services for legal and natural persons both within Latvia and internationally. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with multilingual support and includes key features such as a contact form, partner listings, and a news section. The technical infrastructure is modern and includes SEO optimization and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which may impact user trust slightly. Overall, the site presents a credible and professional image suitable for its legal arbitration services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arbitration.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention arbitration.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for arbitration.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the government/non-profit sector, focusing on arbitration and dispute resolution. It targets legal entities and individuals requiring arbitration services, positioning itself as a regional authority in the Baltic area. The business model revolves around providing arbitration services with transparent fee structures and competent arbitrators. Partnerships with reputable legal and governmental organizations enhance its credibility. The website content and structure support a clear and professional communication strategy, although direct contact details are limited. The presence of a multilingual site indicates an intent to serve an international audience.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The contact form is implemented securely with Gravity Forms, but no cookie consent mechanism is detected, which may affect GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers and compliance features.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  4. Include terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policy to increase legal clarity and security transparency.
  5. Provide direct contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to improve user trust and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltijas Starptautiskā šķīrējtiesa
Description
Nevalstiska, neatkarīga institūcija, kas darbojas pastāvīgi un ir tiesīga izšķirt civiltiesiskus strīdus starp juridiskām un fiziskām personām, neatkarīgi no to atrašanās vietas Latvijā vai ārpus Latvijas.
Key services
šķīrējtiesas pakalpojumi, šķīrējtiesnešu izvēle, tiesvedības izdevumu kalkulators
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Gravity Forms, WPML
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Latvian with English alternate language available
  3. Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like Yoast SEO and Gravity Forms
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found, only a contact form
  5. Privacy policy page exists but no cookie consent mechanism detected
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages found
  7. Partner logos link to reputable Latvian legal and governmental domains
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, Gravity Forms for contact form functionality, and WPML for multilingual support. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript assets, ensuring responsive design and good user experience on mobile devices. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. Accessibility features are basic but present. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arbitration.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arbitration.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.