Arbeitskammer des Saarlandes · Government · Germany
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.
The Arbeitskammer des Saarlandes is a public institution established in 1951 with constitutional status, representing the interests of employees in the Saarland region of Germany. It provides consulting, education, research, and advocacy services to its members, funded primarily through employer-deducted membership contributions. The website serves as an information hub for employees, offering news, events, publications, and access to various thematic portals. The institution maintains an active presence on major social media platforms and provides clear contact information for members and the press. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery, ensuring a modern and responsive user experience. It uses Matomo analytics, which respects user privacy better than many alternatives. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. Security is solid with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some advanced security headers and publicly disclosed security policies. From a security and compliance perspective, the site does not publicly display privacy or cookie policies, nor does it provide incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which are areas for improvement. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and no suspicious or adult content is present. WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, indicating a trustworthy domain registration. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves its public service mission effectively, but could enhance privacy compliance and security transparency to further strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention arbeitskammer.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for arbeitskammer.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with arbeitskammer.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arbeitskammer.de.