Skip to main content

Security report for arakalnozols.lv

ARA Kalnozols · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ARA Kalnozols is a small Latvian manufacturing company specializing in the design and production of factory equipment, metal processing, and laser cutting/engraving services. Their offerings include production line manufacturing, cranberry harvesting combines, custom factory equipment, and renovation of automatic devices and conveyors. Additionally, they provide rental services for recreational cabins, tubs, saunas, and golf equipment. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with a focus on usability and content presentation. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenges, and it uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communication. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing security headers, indicates room for improvement in compliance and security posture. Overall, the website presents a professional image suitable for its niche industrial audience but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arakalnozols.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a niche focus on industrial equipment and metal processing in Latvia. Their business model combines manufacturing with equipment rental services, targeting industrial clients and agricultural businesses. The website content suggests a small-sized enterprise with localized operations. The lack of WHOIS data limits insights into company age and registration details. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website. The company leverages modern web technologies but lacks advanced analytics or marketing tools, indicating a straightforward digital presence. The clear contact information and service descriptions support business credibility, though the absence of trust signals like certifications or testimonials suggests a conservative market approach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider integrating analytics and marketing tools with privacy-respecting configurations to enhance business intelligence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ARA Kalnozols
Description
ARA Kalnozols is a company specializing in manufacturing factory equipment, metal processing, laser cutting and engraving. They offer services including production line design and manufacturing, cranberry harvesting combines, custom factory equipment, renovation of automatic devices and conveyors, metal processing, and CNC laser cutting and engraving. They also provide rental services for recreational cabins, tubs, saunas, and golf equipment.
Key services
Production line design and manufacturing, Cranberry harvesting combines, Custom factory equipment, Renovation of automatic devices and conveyors, Metal processing and custom orders, CNC laser cutting and engraving, Rental of recreational cabins, tubs, saunas, and golf equipment
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Elementor, Essential Addons for Elementor
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical address is clearly presented.
  4. No security.txt or incident response information is provided.
  5. The site uses WordPress with Elementor and related plugins.
  6. No analytics or tracking services detected in the HTML content.
  7. No social media links found on the homepage.
  8. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  9. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits; domain registration details are unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Elementor page builder plugin, using jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources. Performance appears moderate with no evident heavy scripts or trackers. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and adaptive layouts. Accessibility features are basic but present, such as skip links and focus management. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and canonical links but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and server details are not disclosed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arakalnozols.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arakalnozols.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.