Skip to main content

Security report for aragon.sh

Private by Design, LLC · Other · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

72/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website aragon.sh is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Tunnel error (Error 1033), indicating that the Cloudflare Tunnel service is not resolving the site properly. The domain is registered to Private by Design, LLC, a US-based entity, with a registration date in 2019 and no privacy protection on WHOIS data. Due to the site being blocked, no business content, policies, or contact information are available for review. The technical infrastructure relies on Cloudflare services, but the lack of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the security posture. The site does not provide privacy or cookie policies, nor terms of service, limiting compliance and trustworthiness. Overall, the site appears to be a small business or startup but is currently non-functional online.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aragon.sh

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
72

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Given the lack of accessible content, no detailed business intelligence can be derived from the website. The registrant, Private by Design, LLC, suggests a privacy-focused or security-related business, but no explicit services or market positioning are visible. The domain age is consistent with a young company. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The absence of contact details and policies limits the ability to assess customer engagement or regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the site being inaccessible and lacking visible security headers or DNSSEC. The Cloudflare Tunnel error indicates a misconfiguration or downtime in the Cloudflare Tunnel service. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further reduces compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Recommendations include fixing the tunnel configuration, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Restore Cloudflare Tunnel functionality to make the website accessible.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance.
  5. Add clear contact information and incident response contacts to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare Tunnel error page indicating the site is inaccessible due to Cloudflare Tunnel resolution failure. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Private by Design, LLC
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare, JavaScript, XMLHttpRequest
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare performance radar
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare performance radar
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible due to Cloudflare Tunnel error (Error 1033).
  2. No visible business content, policies, or contact information on the landing page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or user input fields detected except for a feedback mechanism related to the error page.
  5. No social media links or company contact emails/phone numbers found.
  6. Website relies on Cloudflare infrastructure but lacks DNSSEC and security headers.
  7. No SEO or accessibility optimizations visible due to error page content.
  8. No evidence of advertising or affiliate marketing.
  9. WHOIS data shows a legitimate registration with no privacy protection.
  10. Overall analysis limited by site being blocked/inaccessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare infrastructure and JavaScript for error feedback collection. The HTML content is minimal and serves only as an error page. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improved security. Performance and accessibility cannot be assessed due to the site being blocked. The technical debt includes dependency on a single Cloudflare Tunnel instance without load balancing enabled, increasing risk of downtime.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aragon.sh. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aragon.sh.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.