Skip to main content

Security report for arabiandicks.com

Global Domains International, Inc. DBA DomainCostClub.com · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ArabianDicks.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in gay pornographic content targeted at adults aged 18 or 21 and older depending on jurisdiction. The site operates on a membership or subscription business model, leveraging affiliate marketing and third-party payment processors to monetize its content. The domain is long-standing, registered since 2006, and managed by Global Domains International, a known domain registrar and service provider. The website content is accessible without WAF or security challenges, but the site lacks advanced security configurations and comprehensive privacy compliance mechanisms. Technically, the site uses basic web technologies with Google Analytics for tracking and Amazon AWS for DNS hosting. The site has basic mobile optimization and SEO metadata but lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications. Security posture is weak with no DNSSEC, no security headers, and no visible HTTPS enforcement details. Privacy policies and terms of service are hosted on a third-party domain, which may reduce user trust. No cookie consent mechanism is present despite active tracking. Security-wise, the site shows minimal best practices and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, but the overall security and privacy compliance posture is basic. The site would benefit from improved security headers, HTTPS enforcement, and transparent privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, ArabianDicks.com is a niche adult content provider with a basic technical and security setup, moderate business credibility, and several areas for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arabiandicks.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a niche adult entertainment market segment focusing on gay pornography. Its business model relies on membership access and affiliate marketing, supported by multiple payment processors such as CCBill, Epoch, and SegPay. The domain's longevity since 2006 indicates stable operations. However, the lack of direct company contact information and reliance on third-party domains for legal policies suggest limited transparency. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processors and affiliate networks, which are critical for monetization. Growth indicators are not visible from the site content. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its niche content offering but is limited by basic technical and security infrastructure.

Security posture

The security maturity level of ArabianDicks.com is low to moderate. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers exposes the site to potential DNS spoofing and clickjacking risks. No visible HTTPS enforcement or HSTS headers were detected, which may expose users to man-in-the-middle attacks. The site lacks a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie consent mechanism despite tracking via Google Analytics. The domain registration is stable and not privacy protected, which is positive for trust. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security best practices and compliance to reduce business risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Enforce HTTPS site-wide with HSTS to ensure secure communications and protect user data.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations given the use of tracking technologies.
  5. Host privacy policy and terms of service on the main domain to improve transparency and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Global Domains International, Inc. DBA DomainCostClub.com
Description
Adult entertainment website featuring sexually explicit material targeted at adults over 18 or 21 depending on location.
Key services
Adult video content, Membership access
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, AWS DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content portal with explicit material warnings and age gating.
  2. No forms or data collection fields detected on the splash page.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page.
  4. Privacy and terms policies are hosted on a third-party domain (westbill.com), which may reduce trust.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of Google Analytics.
  6. No social media links or official company contact information found.
  7. Use of multiple external payment and affiliate domains indicates monetization via memberships and affiliate marketing.
  8. Basic SEO metadata present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags.
  9. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  10. No visible HTTPS enforcement or HSTS headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML with inline CSS and Google Analytics for tracking. DNS is hosted on Amazon AWS nameservers, indicating reliable hosting infrastructure. No modern CMS or JavaScript frameworks were detected, suggesting a simple static or minimally dynamic site. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO metadata is present but minimal, with no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks accessibility features and security headers, indicating technical debt and modernization opportunities. Improving technical infrastructure with modern frameworks, enhanced SEO, and security configurations would benefit business operations and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arabiandicks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arabiandicks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.