Skip to main content

Security report for aquaticsintegrity.com

Aquatics Integrity Unit · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aquatics Integrity Unit is a recently established organization (domain created in December 2022) focused on promoting integrity within aquatic sports. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Astra theme, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. Hosting is provided by Infomaniak Network SA, a reputable provider. The site implements HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting basic compliance with privacy regulations. However, it lacks visible privacy policy, terms of service, and contact information, which limits transparency and user trust. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and incident response disclosures. Overall, the website is professional but content is limited, suggesting an early-stage or niche-focused entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aquaticsintegrity.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Aquatics Integrity Unit appears to serve a specialized niche in aquatic sports integrity, targeting stakeholders such as sports organizations and athletes. The business model is likely regulatory or oversight-focused rather than commercial. The lack of extensive content and contact details suggests a small organization or unit. The website's technical setup is standard for small to medium organizations, leveraging popular CMS and plugins. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The organization has not published certifications or compliance frameworks publicly. Growth potential may depend on expanding content, transparency, and stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced with additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and transparency
  3. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting
  5. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts to enhance trust
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aquatics Integrity Unit
Description
The website appears to represent the Aquatics Integrity Unit, likely an organization focused on integrity and compliance within aquatic sports or related activities. The site content is minimal in the provided data, but it is branded and styled professionally with a focus on integrity in aquatics.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Astra Theme, jQuery, Uncanny LearnDash Toolkit, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and Astra theme
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookie Law Info plugin
  3. No visible privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content
  5. No social media links detected in the provided HTML
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. Website is HTTPS secured with valid SSL
  8. No advanced security headers detected in the provided data
  9. Content is professional but limited in scope and volume
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond basic plugins
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 with Elementor 3.25.10 and Astra theme 4.8.7, indicating a modern CMS environment. It uses common libraries such as jQuery and includes plugins like Uncanny LearnDash Toolkit and Cookie Law Info. Hosting is by Infomaniak Network SA, a known provider. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and YouTube. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design in Astra and Elementor. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and canonical links but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small organization but could benefit from performance and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aquaticsintegrity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aquaticsintegrity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.