Skip to main content

Security report for aquapurge.com

Aqua Purge · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aqua Purge is a specialized manufacturing company providing purging compound solutions for plastics processing industries such as injection moulding, extrusion, and blow moulding. The company positions itself as a global leader in removing carbon contamination to improve production efficiency and reduce downtime. Their website is professionally designed, content-rich, and targets plastics processors and manufacturers seeking operational improvements. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and policies could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy, but the active and professional web presence mitigates some risk. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong business and technical foundation with room for enhanced security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aquapurge.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on B2B sales of purging compounds that address contamination issues in plastics processing. Their market position is that of a niche specialist with a global distributor network. The business model revolves around product sales supported by technical resources such as case studies and instructional content. The website's multilingual support and social media presence indicate a global outreach strategy. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales and distributor partnerships. The company shows signs of growth and digital marketing sophistication but lacks publicly visible detailed corporate information such as founding year or parent company data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses reputable analytics and marketing scripts. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and does not publish a security policy or incident response information. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with good technical controls but limited policy transparency and incident readiness visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and make accessible a security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
03463169
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aqua Purge
Description
Aquapurge purging compound solutions for plastics processing — remove carbon contamination, reduce downtime, and improve injection moulding, extrusion & blow moulding performance.
Key services
Purging compounds for plastics processing, Carbon contamination removal, Injection moulding, extrusion, blow moulding cleaning solutions, Distributor locator, Technical support and case studies
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, All in One SEO, MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin), Lead Forensics tracking, LeadConnectorHQ chat widget, Google Tag Manager, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Lead Forensics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Lead Forensics, Demandbase
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, LeadConnectorHQ chat widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for an active commercial domain
  4. Strong SEO and social media integration
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or header
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building, supported by SEO and analytics plugins such as All in One SEO and MonsterInsights. It integrates third-party marketing and tracking services including Lead Forensics and LeadConnectorHQ chat widget. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and security header implementation. The technical stack is mature but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and clearer hosting information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aquapurge.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aquapurge.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.