Skip to main content

Security report for appvizer.one

Cloud is Mine · Other · France

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain appvizer.one is registered to 'Cloud is Mine' in France since 2018, indicating a legitimate registration with a reputable registrar OVH sas. However, the website content is completely inaccessible, returning a 404 Not Found error page with no metadata, forms, or business information available. This lack of content prevents any meaningful analysis of the business operations, services, or security posture. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with no detectable technologies or scripts, and no security headers or policies are present. The absence of HTTPS information and security best practices further limits the security assessment. Overall, the website is non-functional from a user perspective, representing a critical issue for business credibility and trust.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching appvizer.one

This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible website content, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The only available data is the WHOIS registration information indicating a small entity named 'Cloud is Mine' based in France. No information about market positioning, services, or partnerships is available. The domain age suggests the business has been established since 2018, but the current website status does not reflect active operations or customer engagement.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the absence of website content and security headers. No HTTPS status is provided, and no security policies or incident response contacts are found. The domain registration is transparent and consistent, which is a positive trust indicator. However, the lack of any security best practices or policies on the website is a significant gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but this is likely due to the lack of content rather than active security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Restore website content to provide business and security information to users.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.
  3. Add privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with GDPR and build trust.
  4. Publish contact information including security incident response channels.
  5. Deploy security headers and conduct a security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cloud is Mine
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible beyond a 404 Not Found error page.
  2. No metadata, structured data, forms, or external links found in the HTML content.
  3. No contact information, policies, or security disclosures are present on the page.
  4. No scripts or technologies detected due to minimal HTML content.
  5. Domain WHOIS data is available and consistent but website content is missing or removed.
  6. No evidence of WAF or security blocking mechanisms.
  7. Website currently provides no business or security information to users.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal 404 error page with no metadata, scripts, or detectable technologies. Hosting is provided by OVH sas, a reputable provider. The lack of content and technical implementation indicates either a site under construction or decommissioned. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Performance and accessibility cannot be evaluated due to missing content. Technical modernization and content restoration are necessary to support business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with appvizer.one. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review appvizer.one.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.