State Treasury · Government · Finland
Low risk. No critical or high findings.
The website www.haeavustuksia.fi is an official Finnish government service portal operated by the State Treasury. It aggregates all government grant calls in one centralized platform, providing a valuable resource for individuals and organizations seeking funding opportunities in Finland. The site features comprehensive information about grant authorities and open calls, with clear navigation and multilingual support. The business model is a public service platform aimed at improving accessibility and transparency of government grants. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including React for client-side rendering, SVG icons, and CSS modules. It is mobile optimized and accessible, with a cookie consent mechanism in place. Performance is moderate, and SEO best practices are followed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No major technical debts or vulnerabilities were detected in the content. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent. However, explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not published. Security headers are not visibly configured in the HTML content. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adding formal security documentation and headers. The overall risk assessment is low given the official nature of the site, consistent WHOIS data, and absence of suspicious elements. Strategic recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies, implementing security headers, and enhancing transparency around vulnerability disclosures to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
DMARC policy is set to "none"
What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy
MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks
DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.
DNSSEC is not configured for this domain
What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks
This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention applyforgrants.fi, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for applyforgrants.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with applyforgrants.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review applyforgrants.fi.