Skip to main content

Security report for apphub.com

clearer.io · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clearer.io is a technology company specializing in providing advanced, easy-to-integrate applications that enhance product discovery and optimize the customer journey for eCommerce businesses. Their solutions aim to increase conversions and facilitate smart growth, positioning them as a valuable partner in the eCommerce technology ecosystem. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear calls to action and partnership opportunities. Technically, the site is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for technology companies, and the domain appears legitimate based on website quality and partner affiliations. Overall, Clearer.io demonstrates a mature digital presence with a focus on business growth and partnerships, though enhancements in privacy compliance and security policies would strengthen their trustworthiness further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apphub.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clearer.io operates in the eCommerce technology sector, targeting businesses seeking to improve product discovery and customer experience. Their business model is B2B SaaS with a strong emphasis on partnerships, as evidenced by multiple partner logos and a dedicated partner program. The company leverages events and webinars to engage their audience and maintain market relevance. Revenue streams likely include software subscriptions and partnership integrations. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear navigation and relevant content, supporting a small but focused business size. The lack of public WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, common in tech startups or small enterprises. Their competitive advantage lies in simplifying advanced eCommerce solutions and fostering a partner ecosystem.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks explicit security policies or incident response information, which could be a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, limiting avenues for responsible vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers and formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
clearer.io
Description
Clearer.io provides innovative, easy-to-integrate applications designed to enhance product discovery and optimize the customer journey for eCommerce businesses, aiming to increase conversions and smart growth.
Key services
Product discovery enhancement, Customer journey optimization, eCommerce technology integration, Partnership programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Typekit Fonts, jQuery
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Reddit Ads
Marketing tools
Pipedrive (for scheduling/bookings)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via forms.
  3. Privacy and terms policies are present and comprehensive.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  5. WHOIS data is privacy protected, no registrar or dates available.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CDN for performance.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn.
  9. Partner logos indicate active business relationships.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as Typekit fonts and jQuery. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and assets are served via AWS Cloudfront CDN, contributing to moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. The site structure is clear with well-defined navigation and SEO meta tags. However, accessibility features appear basic and could be improved. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, indicating a well-maintained technical infrastructure. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apphub.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apphub.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.