Skip to main content

Security report for apollogames.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Apollo Games is an online casino platform targeting Czech-speaking users, offering free spins and monetary bonuses to attract players. The website is professionally designed with modern JavaScript frameworks and includes cookie consent management to comply with privacy regulations. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and lack of visible contact or legal information reduce the overall trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses Angular components, Less CSS, and integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy policies. Overall, the site appears functional and user-friendly but would benefit from improved transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apollogames.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention apollogames.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10,658
Employees
0
Customers
10,658
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
7%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for apollogames.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the online gambling sector, focusing on casino games and promotional bonuses to attract and retain customers. The target audience is adult gamblers primarily in the Czech Republic. The business model relies on online gaming revenue streams. The website shows consistent branding and good content quality but lacks explicit business registration or certification information. The absence of contact details and WHOIS data may indicate privacy protection or incomplete domain registration, which could impact customer trust. The platform integrates common marketing and tracking tools but does not disclose affiliate or partner relationships explicitly.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms to restrict ad and analytics storage by default, which is a positive privacy practice. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to prevent vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better header configurations and documented security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website.
  3. Provide clear and verified contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and incident response.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online casino platform offering free spins and bonuses, targeting Czech-speaking users.
Key services
Online casino games, Bonuses and free spins
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Less CSS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Smartsupp Chat, Swiper, Bootstrap (implied by CSS imports), Hotjar (commented out), JsStore (commented out)
Frameworks
Angular (implied by app-widget-* custom elements), Less CSS preprocessor
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with denied ad and analytics storage by default
  • Security storage granted in consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot (consent management)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Smartsupp Chat
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or domain not registered.
  2. Website is a Czech language online casino platform.
  3. Uses modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries.
  4. Includes cookie consent mechanism with denied ad and analytics storage by default.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No business registration or certification information found.
  10. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Angular components and Less CSS for styling. It integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance appears moderate based on the complexity of scripts and assets loaded. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Some legacy or commented-out scripts (Hotjar, JsStore) are present but inactive. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO is supported by meta tags and verification tags for Google and Facebook. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved security configurations and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apollogames.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apollogames.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.