Skip to main content

Security report for apold.cz

APOLD SECURITY s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

APOLD SECURITY s.r.o. is a small regional security company based in the Czech Republic, founded in 1992. The company provides physical security, electronic security, cash and valuables transport, and related services primarily in the Plzeňský, Středočeský, Jihočeský regions and Prague. The website content reflects a business with a long-standing presence and a focus on personalized security services. Technically, the website is basic with standard HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS. There is no evidence of advanced analytics, tracking, or advertising technologies. Security posture is limited due to missing HTTPS verification and absence of security headers or policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from improved security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apold.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the security services sector with a focus on physical and electronic security solutions. Its market position is regional with a stable client base including construction firms, insurance companies, schools, and healthcare facilities. The business model centers on service provision with a personalized approach. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data. The lack of contact details and privacy policies online may limit customer trust and compliance with regulations. Growth opportunities could include digital transformation and enhanced online presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic and could be improved. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers is a concern. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The website does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities but lacks proactive security measures. The company should implement HTTPS, security headers, and publish privacy and security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
APOLD SECURITY s.r.o.
Description
Firma APOLD byla založena Ivanem Šmídem v roce 1992 jako civilní bezpečnostní služba poskytující fyzickou ostrahu. V roce 2006 se transformovala na právnickou osobu APOLD SECURITY s.r.o., rozšířila nabídku služeb o elektronické zabezpečení a zlepšila kvalitu služeb díky novým technologiím a lidskému přístupu.
Key services
Fyzická ostraha, Elektronické zabezpečení, Projektování a montáž EZ, Přeprava peněz a cenin, Vymáhání a správa pohledávek
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage.
  6. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in provided data.
  7. Website uses basic HTML and CSS with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected.
  8. Content is in Czech language targeting local Czech market.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS without detectable CMS or advanced frameworks. No JavaScript libraries or analytics tools are present. The site appears to be hosted on an unknown provider with no visible performance optimization or mobile-first design. The lack of modern technical features suggests potential technical debt and opportunities for modernization. Security configurations are minimal, and no automated tracking or marketing tools are detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apold.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apold.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.