Skip to main content

Security report for apex-timing.com

Apex Timing - Solutions logicielles pour les loisirs multiactivités et sports mécaniques · Other · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Apex Timing is a specialized software company providing comprehensive management solutions for leisure centers and karting activities, including leisure karting and competitive karting. The company offers integrated tools such as certified cash registers, online booking, timing systems, and customer management, serving a global clientele across 53 countries with over 800 clients. Their business model focuses on SaaS subscriptions and partnerships with other leisure and sports technology providers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and related plugins, delivering a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, though improvements in security headers and incident response documentation are recommended. Overall, the company presents a trustworthy and mature digital presence, though the lack of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apex-timing.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Apex Timing holds a strong market position in the niche of leisure and karting management software, leveraging over a decade of experience and a broad international footprint. Their competitive advantage lies in offering tailored solutions for different activity domains and seamless integration with over 20 partner platforms. Revenue streams likely include software subscriptions and possibly hardware or service add-ons. The target customers are leisure centers and karting operators seeking efficient management and timing solutions. The partnership ecosystem with recognized brands enhances credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include continuous product updates and a sizable client base. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding partner integrations and enhancing security and compliance transparency to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. There is no public incident response or security policy documentation, which could hinder rapid response to security events. GDPR compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy, but no cookie consent mechanism was detected, which may be a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and cookie consent implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to ensure compliance with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve security communication.
  5. Regularly audit third-party plugins and scripts to ensure no vulnerable components are in use.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Apex Timing - Solutions logicielles pour les loisirs multiactivités et sports mécaniques
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Apex Timing - Solutions logicielles pour les loisirs multiactivités et sports mécaniques
Description
Apex Timing propose une solution logicielle complète pour la gestion des centres de loisirs, karting de loisirs et karting de compétition, incluant caisse, comptabilité, gestion des membres, e-mailing, chronométrage karting, live timing, assistance à la sécurité.
Key services
gestion de centres de loisirs multiactivités, gestion et chronométrage karting loisirs, gestion et chronométrage karting compétition, solutions de contrôle d’équipement pour sports mécaniques, intégration avec partenaires logiciels
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, jQuery, FontAwesome, Premium Addons for Elementor, OceanWP theme, XPro Elementor Addons
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for an active domain.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and comprehensive.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  7. No visible security headers detected; SSL is properly configured.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  9. Multiple partner logos and external links indicate business ecosystem integration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor page builder and several premium addons, providing a rich and responsive user interface. The tech stack includes jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. Performance is moderate, with caching and minification evident in CSS and JS assets. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and mobile menus implemented. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and structured JSON-LD data. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious approach or minimal tracking. Technical risks are low, but the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are notable gaps.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apex-timing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apex-timing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.