Skip to main content

Security report for antislip.lv

Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website antislip.lv is a Latvian language site focused on providing industrial floor repair, warehouse marking, ground stabilization, and building and floor lifting services. The business appears to be a small local service provider with a good reputation in Latvia. The site uses modern frontend technologies such as React, Gatsby, and Tailwind CSS, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as explicit contact information, which limits its compliance and user trust. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers or advanced configurations, and no WHOIS data was available due to query limits, restricting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is accessible and safe but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching antislip.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Antislip.lv operates in the manufacturing/construction sector, specializing in industrial floor repair and related services. The business model is service-oriented targeting industrial and commercial clients in Latvia. The company positions itself as a reputable local provider with key services including floor repair, warehouse marking, ground stabilization, and waterproofing. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies or partnerships. The website content is relevant and professional but lacks detailed business information such as company registration or VAT numbers. The absence of contact details and policies may impact customer confidence and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed due to lack of headers data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, which limits data exposure but also reduces marketing insights. The site should implement security best practices, including secure headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify via security headers.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to enhance trust and security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Uzņēmums ar labu reputāciju kvalitatīvi veiks industriālo grīdu remontu un atjaunošanu, noliktavu marķēšanu, grunts stabilizāciju, ēku un grīdu pacelšanu
Key services
industriālo grīdu remonts un atjaunošana, noliktavu marķēšana, grunts stabilizācija, ēku un grīdu pacelšana, hidroizolācija
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Tailwind CSS
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Latvian language targeting local industrial clients.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No social media links or external partner domains detected.
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies (React, Gatsby, Tailwind CSS).
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Content is business focused and safe for general audiences.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including React and Gatsby, styled with Tailwind CSS. The site appears to be performant with moderate loading speed and good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data included. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks analytics and marketing tools, which could be an opportunity for growth. Technical debt appears low but the absence of security headers and compliance policies indicates areas for improvement in technical governance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with antislip.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review antislip.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.