Skip to main content

Security report for anticimex.dk

Anticimex - skadedyrsbekæmpelse og fødevaresikkerhed · Other · Denmark

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anticimex.dk is a professional Danish pest control service provider offering a wide range of pest management and food safety solutions for both businesses and private customers. The company emphasizes digital and environmentally friendly pest control methods, providing services such as rodent control, insect eradication, bird protection, and pest insurance. The website reflects a mature market position with a comprehensive service portfolio and clear contact channels, including phone and online forms. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The site integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Marketo, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager, demonstrating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented, indicating compliance with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs standard security headers, contributing to a strong security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response page suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic recommendations include publishing a formal security policy, establishing an incident response contact, and considering a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anticimex.dk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anticimex.dk operates in the pest control and food safety sector within Denmark, targeting both commercial and private clients. The company leverages digital pest control technologies alongside traditional methods, positioning itself as an innovative and environmentally conscious service provider. The business model focuses on service delivery with additional offerings such as pest insurance, enhancing customer retention and value. The website's clear segmentation for businesses and private customers indicates a well-defined target market. The use of customer portals and extensive informational content supports customer engagement and operational efficiency. While no explicit financial data is available, the scale and professionalism suggest a large enterprise with established market presence. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and leverages multiple digital marketing tools to support growth and customer acquisition.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. Forms appear to be secured with validation and CAPTCHA mechanisms, reducing risk of automated abuse. No signs of outdated or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response information limits transparency and preparedness visibility. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could be beneficial for coordinated vulnerability management. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and incident response communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user trust by adding visible certifications or trust badges related to security and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anticimex - skadedyrsbekæmpelse og fødevaresikkerhed
Description
Skadedyrsbekæmpelse og -forebyggelse i hele Danmark ✓ Professionelt og giftfri ✓ Ring til Anticimex og få hjælp ☎ 69 15 17 44
Key services
Digital skadedyrskontrol 24/7, Rottebekæmpelse, Bekæmpelse af mus, Fuglesikring, Myrebekæmpelse, Bekæmpelse af væggelus, Bekæmpelse af skægkræ, Bekæmpelse af kakerlakker, Skadedyrsforsikring
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Microsoft Clarity, CookieHub
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CAPTCHA and validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Marketo, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Marketo, CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Danish and targeted at Danish businesses and private customers
  3. Strong focus on pest control services with detailed service listings
  4. Multiple contact options including phone and contact forms
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive
  7. No visible security or privacy red flags in content or technical setup
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based static site generator framework, Gatsby, which supports fast loading times and excellent SEO. Integration with marketing and analytics platforms such as Marketo, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager indicates a mature digital infrastructure. The site uses responsive design techniques and accessibility best practices, providing a good user experience across devices. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected in the provided HTML. Hosting details are not explicitly available, but the use of CDN services like Sanity.io for images suggests a distributed content delivery approach. Overall, the technical implementation is robust, scalable, and aligned with current web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anticimex.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anticimex.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.