Skip to main content

Security report for anticimex.com

Anticimex Group · Other · Sweden

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anticimex Group is a global leader in modern pest control services, leveraging prevention, advanced technology, and sustainable solutions to meet the needs of both individuals and businesses. The company operates in multiple countries with dedicated local sites and emphasizes innovation through its Anticimex SMART intelligent pest control solutions and an Innovation Center focused on environmentally friendly alternatives. The website reflects a mature, professional enterprise with strong branding and comprehensive content aimed at business and individual customers seeking pest control and environmental health services. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks like Gatsby and React, with good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks publicly available security policies or incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but does not detract from the overall legitimacy given the company's global footprint and professional presentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anticimex.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anticimex holds a strong market position as a large enterprise in the pest control sector, focusing on technology-driven and sustainable pest management services. Its business model centers on service delivery enhanced by digital innovations such as SMART devices and data analytics. The company demonstrates growth through acquisitions and a broad geographic presence. Partnerships and subsidiary domains indicate a well-established ecosystem. The website content and press releases highlight ongoing innovation and leadership in the industry. Revenue streams likely include service contracts, technology solutions, and consulting. Target customers range from commercial enterprises to residential clients. The company maintains a professional image with clear governance documents like a Code of Conduct and privacy policies, supporting business credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting good baseline security and privacy practices. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or security.txt file indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Security headers were not explicitly identified, suggesting potential enhancement opportunities. The WHOIS data absence is a minor concern but may be due to privacy or registry policies. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing formal security documentation and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  3. Provide contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to enhance GDPR compliance visibility.
  4. Review and enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Investigate and clarify WHOIS data availability or use verified domain registration services to improve domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Anticimex Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anticimex Group
Description
Anticimex is a modern pest control company focused on prevention, cutting-edge technology, and sustainable solutions to meet demands for healthy environments for individuals and businesses.
Key services
Pest control, SMART intelligent pest control solutions, Sustainable pest management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong global presence with multiple country-specific domains linked.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is uncommon for a large enterprise.
  6. Website uses modern technologies and good SEO and accessibility practices.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Gatsby, a modern React-based static site generator, ensuring fast loading times and good SEO. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and CookieHub for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting details are not explicit but the use of CDN services like Sanity.io for images suggests a robust content delivery infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation supports a high-quality user experience and efficient content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anticimex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anticimex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.