Skip to main content

Security report for anticimex.be

Anticimex · Other · Belgium

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anticimex Belgium is a professional pest control and prevention service provider targeting both businesses and private individuals across Belgium. The company emphasizes the use of new technologies and sustainable solutions to deliver efficient and environmentally friendly pest management services. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with clear service offerings, including rodent control, insect control, bird control, bedbug treatment, fumigation, disinfection, and training programs. The site is well-branded and consistent, supporting their market position as a leading pest control expert in Belgium. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Gatsby and React, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The presence of Google Tag Manager and CookieHub indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented, contributing to a strong security posture. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not found, which could be improved. Overall, the security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is good, with clear cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies in place. The WHOIS data is restricted due to .be domain policies, but the website's professionalism and content quality support its legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, establishing a vulnerability disclosure program, and enhancing incident response transparency. The website is safe for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content detected. It serves as a reliable digital front for Anticimex's pest control services in Belgium.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anticimex.be

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anticimex operates in the pest control sector, serving a broad range of industries including municipalities, food industry, pharmaceuticals, healthcare, supermarkets, logistics, hospitality, and more. Their business model focuses on providing professional pest management solutions supported by digital innovations like Anticimex SMART. The company targets both commercial and residential customers, indicating a diversified customer base. The presence of job listings and training programs suggests organizational growth and investment in human capital. The website's content and structure indicate a strong market position in Belgium, leveraging sustainability and technology as competitive advantages. Partnerships or related digital platforms like Digimex enhance their service ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries. The use of modern frameworks reduces common web vulnerabilities. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies, but explicit references to security frameworks or certifications are missing. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and incident management disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention and privacy compliance details.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anticimex
Description
Specialist in ongediertebestrijding – en preventie voor bedrijven en particulieren, vertegenwoordigd in gans België. Wij omarmen nieuwe technologie, waardoor wij onze klanten een efficiëntere en milieuvriendelijkere service kunnen bieden. Wij streven ook naar duurzame oplossingen.
Key services
Ongediertebestrijding, Knaagdierbestrijding, Insectenbestrijding, Vogelwering, Bedwantsenbestrijding, Fumigatie, Desinfectie, Bouwkundige wering, Zwambestrijding, Opleidingen
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, React, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub, Forms2.js
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and well-structured in Dutch language targeting Belgium.
  3. Strong focus on pest control services for both businesses and private individuals.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and compliance with privacy regulations.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. WHOIS data is restricted, limiting domain registration transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Gatsby and React, leveraging static site generation for fast load times and excellent SEO. Integration with Google Tag Manager and CookieHub shows advanced analytics and privacy management capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. Performance appears fast with modern CSS and JavaScript usage. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience and scalable infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anticimex.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anticimex.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.