Skip to main content

Security report for anslavseglitis.lv

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website anslavseglitis.lv is a small-scale cultural and literary site dedicated to the Latvian author Anšlavs Eglītis. It primarily features literary quotes and cultural content without commercial or business-oriented information. The site uses basic web technologies including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Font Awesome icons, and integrates Facebook Pixel for visitor tracking. There is no evidence of a content management system or advanced frameworks. The site lacks privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and does not provide contact information or forms for user interaction. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers or HTTPS status information. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences but has limited technical sophistication and lacks compliance and trust indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anslavseglitis.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site does not represent a commercial business but rather serves as a cultural homage to Anšlavs Eglītis. There is no indication of revenue streams, partnerships, or market positioning. The target audience is general public interested in Latvian literature and culture. The absence of contact details and business information suggests it is likely maintained by a small entity or individual. No competitive or strategic business insights can be derived from the content.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The site uses Facebook Pixel for tracking but lacks privacy disclosures or cookie consent mechanisms, which may raise GDPR compliance concerns. No security headers or HTTPS status were identified in the data provided. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. The absence of incident response or security policy information indicates minimal security governance. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS, security headers, privacy policies, and transparent data handling practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS to secure data in transit and improve trust.
  2. Add privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Include contact information and a security incident response contact.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website dedicated to Anšlavs Eglītis, featuring literary quotes and cultural content related to the Latvian author.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Font Awesome 5.13.0, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple cultural/literary site dedicated to Anšlavs Eglītis.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
  5. Uses Facebook Pixel for tracking without visible privacy disclosures.
  6. No forms or data collection fields detected.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Minimal technical sophistication; basic HTML/CSS/JS with external font and tracking scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, using external resources like Font Awesome and Facebook Pixel. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content and external CDN usage. Mobile optimization is good with viewport meta tag and responsive design elements. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA or advanced features. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anslavseglitis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anslavseglitis.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.