Skip to main content

Security report for annodata.co.uk

Kyocera-Annodata · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kyocera Annodata is a UK-based managed services provider specializing in digital transformation solutions including cloud, IT infrastructure, collaboration tools, content services, and cybersecurity. The company positions itself as a leading MSP in the UK market, leveraging its parent company Kyocera's brand and expertise. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with a focus on business clients seeking innovative IT solutions. The business model centers on managed services and technology enablement for enterprises and mid-sized organizations. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, integrating advanced analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Adobe Analytics, alongside a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. The site demonstrates good SEO practices, mobile optimization, and moderate performance. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy, and the domain registration is consistent with the company's founding date in 2022. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS with DNSSEC enabled and uses cookie consent to comply with GDPR. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The site uses third-party scripts managed through Google Tag Manager and Adobe Launch, which should be regularly audited to mitigate risks. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional with a good security posture but could improve transparency around security policies and incident response. The domain registration data supports legitimacy, and no suspicious activity or content safety concerns were detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching annodata.co.uk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kyocera Annodata operates in the competitive UK managed services market, leveraging Kyocera's brand to offer a comprehensive portfolio of IT and cloud solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in integrated services spanning collaboration, content management, infrastructure, and cybersecurity. The business targets mid-sized to large enterprises seeking digital transformation. Revenue streams likely include managed service contracts, cloud subscriptions, and hardware/software sales. The company maintains strategic partnerships with Kyocera service and supply shops, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent domain registration aligned with company founding and active digital marketing via analytics and social media. The company’s operations reflect a mature digital strategy with room for enhanced security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, DNSSEC enabled, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism supporting GDPR compliance. Use of Google Tag Manager and Adobe Launch allows controlled script deployment, reducing risk exposure. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents compliance and transparency gaps. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Security headers beyond DNSSEC and HTTPS are not explicitly identified, suggesting potential for enhancement. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by formalizing policies and adding security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Add additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kyocera-Annodata
Description
Unlock the potential of your business with Kyocera Annodata. Specialists in empowering you through digital transformation with innovative cloud and IT solutions tailored to your needs.
Key services
Cloud solutions, IT infrastructure, Collaboration tools, Content services, Managed services, Document solutions, Cybersecurity
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.0, Elementor 4.1.3, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights), Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Adobe DTM/Launch
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Adobe Launch for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Adobe Analytics, Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, MonsterInsights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder.
  2. Strong cookie consent mechanism with Cookiebot and granular controls.
  3. Multiple Google Analytics and Adobe Analytics integrations for tracking.
  4. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter (x.com), and YouTube.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. Domain registration is recent but consistent with business age.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Good SEO and metadata implementation with Yoast SEO plugin.
  10. Website performance is moderate with good mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress 7.0 platform using Elementor 4.1.3 for page building, indicating a contemporary CMS choice with flexibility. Integration with Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, and Leadfeeder shows advanced tracking and marketing capabilities. Cookiebot provides GDPR-compliant cookie management with granular user consent. Hosting is via GoDaddy, a reputable provider, with DNSSEC enabled enhancing DNS security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well implemented using Yoast SEO plugin with structured data and Open Graph tags. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security management. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with annodata.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review annodata.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.