Skip to main content

Security report for annexnet.com

杉山労務管理事務所 · Other · Japan

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

杉山労務管理事務所 is a small, regionally focused social insurance labor consultant office based in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. The company provides labor management services including labor risk assessment, employment regulation creation and revision, and support for administrative investigations. Their target audience is primarily small to medium businesses in the Kanto region. The website content is primarily in Japanese and offers free labor risk diagnostic tools via external links. Technically, the website is basic with no CMS detected, minimal JavaScript and CSS usage, and no advanced frameworks. Performance data is missing but inferred slow. Critically, the site lacks HTTPS support and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to security risks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no security best practices such as security headers or incident response information are published. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and a contact form embedded via iframe. Overall, the site is functional but lacks modern security and privacy compliance measures, which significantly impacts trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching annexnet.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the labor management consulting sector, focusing on labor risk mitigation and compliance for local businesses. It leverages free diagnostic tools to engage potential clients and maintains a modest social media presence on Instagram. The business model is service-oriented, relying on direct client engagement and consultation. Market positioning is local and specialized, with no evidence of large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries. The website branding is moderately consistent but lacks trust signals such as certifications or testimonials. The absence of privacy and security policies may affect client confidence and regulatory compliance. There is no indication of advanced digital marketing or analytics usage, suggesting a traditional approach to client acquisition.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical vulnerability. No modern TLS protocols or cipher suites are enabled, and security headers are missing. The site does not implement HSTS, OCSP stapling, or session resumption, which are standard security best practices. There is no evidence of incident response policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further exposes the business to compliance risks, particularly under GDPR or similar regulations. Overall, the security maturity is low, and immediate remediation is required to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with data protection regulations.
  4. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload options to enforce HTTPS.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and publish contact information for security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
杉山労務管理事務所
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an nginx 1.20.1 server with no SSL certificate installed, serving content over HTTP only. The DNS records show a single IPv4 address and MX records for mail handling. No DNSSEC or CAA records are configured, which could improve DNS security. The site uses basic JavaScript and CSS files without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance metrics are missing, but the absence of resource counts and load time suggests slow or unmeasured performance. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tags and responsive classes, but no advanced accessibility features are detected. SEO is basic with meta description and Open Graph tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD. External links include social media and diagnostic tools hosted on third-party domains. Overall, the technical infrastructure is minimal and requires modernization to improve security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with annexnet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review annexnet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.