Skip to main content

Security report for annateada.ee

MTÜ Eesti Linnade ja Valdade Liit · Government · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anna teada is a public service website operated by MTÜ Eesti Linnade ja Valdade Liit, enabling Estonian citizens to report local maintenance and public order issues to relevant municipal or state authorities. The platform leverages Google Maps API for geolocation and provides a user-friendly interface with clear instructions and privacy policies. It is funded by the European Regional Development Fund and developed in cooperation with the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity with modern technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, and Google Analytics integrated for functionality and analytics. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and spam protection, though improvements are recommended in security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with clear privacy statements though lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professionally presented, and serves an essential government-related function.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching annateada.ee

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets Estonian residents and local authorities, positioning itself as a niche public service tool for reporting and managing local infrastructure and public order issues. Its business model is non-commercial, funded by public and EU sources, emphasizing transparency and community engagement. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its integration with local government workflows and ease of use. The partnership ecosystem includes the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications and the European Regional Development Fund. Growth potential is linked to increased public awareness and mobile app adoption. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced privacy and security features to maintain trust and compliance.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate, with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms from spam. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of DNSSEC implementation represent gaps that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response contact information is not explicitly provided, which could delay handling of security incidents. The privacy policy indicates reasonable data protection measures, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the annateada.ee domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add an explicit cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR cookie requirements.
  4. Publish clear incident response and abuse contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MTÜ Eesti Linnade ja Valdade Liit
Description
Rakendus võimaldab teavitada kohalikke omavalitsusi või riigiasutusi heakorraprobleemidest nagu prügi, teed, valgustus, valesti parkimine jne.
Key services
Heakorraprobleemide teavitamine, Probleemide edastamine omavalitsustele ja riigiasutustele, Kaardipõhine probleemide visualiseerimine
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Maps API, jQuery 2.1.4, Bootstrap 3.3.5, Google Fonts (Roboto, Google Sans), Google reCAPTCHA v2 Invisible
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Invisible Google reCAPTCHA used for spam prevention
  • No sensitive data exposed in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a public service platform for reporting local maintenance issues in Estonia.
  2. Content is in Estonian language with clear instructions and privacy statements.
  3. Uses Google Maps API for geolocation and problem marking.
  4. Includes modals for help, good practice guidelines, and about information.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. No explicit terms of service found.
  7. No explicit cookie consent banner despite cookie usage.
  8. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  9. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided.
  10. Contact email for support/assistance is abi@annateada.ee.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a stable technology stack including Bootstrap 3.3.5, jQuery 2.1.4, Google Maps API, and Google Fonts. The site is hosted by Zone Media OÜ, a known Estonian registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred loading of Google Maps API. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA labels and keyboard shortcut support for maps. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no structured JSON-LD schema beyond SoftwareApplication. Technical risks include outdated jQuery version and lack of advanced security headers. Modernization opportunities include upgrading to newer frameworks and enhancing accessibility and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with annateada.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review annateada.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.