Skip to main content

Security report for anna-kraher.de

Anna Kraher · Other · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anna Kraher's website serves as a professional academic and artistic portfolio focusing on the societal implications of artificial intelligence and Big Tech. The site highlights her research assistant role at Osnabrück University and her involvement in ethics and critical theories of AI. The content is well-structured and targets an audience interested in AI ethics, media theory, and art. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Kalium theme and WPBakery page builder, hosted on Servus.at. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are recommended for GDPR compliance. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, and the site is fully accessible.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anna-kraher.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Anna Kraher as a niche academic and artistic professional in AI ethics and critical theory. The business model is centered on research and artistic projects rather than commercial services. The target audience includes academics, researchers, and artists interested in AI and societal impacts. The site does not display commercial transactions or partnerships, indicating a focus on personal branding and academic visibility. The presence of social media links to Instagram and Bluesky suggests engagement with broader communities. No advertising or tracking tools are present, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or incident response contacts, which are best practices for security transparency. The site does not appear to expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Include clear contact information for security incidents or data protection officer if applicable.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anna Kraher
Description
Anna Kraher is a researcher and artist exploring societal implications of artificial intelligence (AI) and Big Tech, focusing on AI ideologies, predictive analytics, and temporalities. She is a research assistant at Osnabrück University in the Ethics and Critical Theories of AI research group and part of the Data Ethics Outreach Lab. She holds degrees in Design & Computation, Computer Science, and Gender Studies.
Key services
Research assistance, Artistic projects related to AI and society
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Kalium Theme, jQuery, GSAP, Video.js, LightGallery
Frameworks
WPBakery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal academic and artistic portfolio site.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to email with obfuscated format.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. Uses WordPress with common plugins and themes.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Content is in English and German, primarily English.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  10. Site is accessible without WAF or blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with the Kalium theme and WPBakery page builder, indicating ease of content management and customization. The tech stack includes jQuery, GSAP for animations, Video.js for media handling, and LightGallery for image galleries. Hosting is provided by Servus.at, a known hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images implemented. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. No major technical risks are evident, but security improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anna-kraher.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anna-kraher.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.