Skip to main content

Security report for anmari.com

Anna-marie Redpath · Technology · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anmari.com is a personal portfolio website for Anna-marie Redpath, showcasing her work in WordPress plugin development, web design services, and art. The site serves as a hub linking to various projects and social media profiles, targeting individuals interested in WordPress tools and personal creative work. The domain is well-established, dating back to 2002, indicating a mature personal brand presence. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML and CSS, utilizing Font Awesome icons. There is no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting appears to be via GoDaddy, with no DNSSEC enabled and no advanced security headers present. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and accessibility but lacks modern SEO and performance enhancements. From a security perspective, the site lacks privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and DNSSEC, which lowers its security posture. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing risk but also limiting user engagement. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website content, showing no suspicious patterns and a legitimate long-term registration. Overall, the site is a straightforward personal portfolio with moderate technical maturity and basic security. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and contact information transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anmari.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small personal brand focused on WordPress plugin development, web design, and art sales. Its market positioning is niche, targeting WordPress users and art buyers. The business model is primarily service and product promotion through direct links and personal branding. Revenue streams likely include plugin sales, web design services, and art commissions or sales. The partnership ecosystem includes related WordPress plugin sites and an art sales platform. Growth indicators are limited but supported by long domain tenure and active social media presence. The operation is lean, with no indication of subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. The absence of security headers, DNSSEC, and privacy policies indicates gaps in security best practices and compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing exposure but also limiting engagement. The lack of HTTPS status data is a concern; assuming HTTPS is enabled, the SSL configuration quality is unknown. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to align with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add explicit contact information including company email and phone number for transparency.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance security posture and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anna-marie Redpath
Description
Personal Profile Page - Anmari aka Anna-marie Redpath. The site showcases personal projects, WordPress plugins, art, and links to social media profiles.
Key services
WordPress web design services, WordPress user directories and listings plugin, WordPress events and calendar plugin, Art sales via Bluethumb
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Font Awesome 4.7.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  3. Social media profiles are linked but no direct company contact info.
  4. No forms detected on the page.
  5. No security headers or DNSSEC enabled.
  6. Website is a personal portfolio with multiple small projects and WordPress plugin promotions.
  7. No advertising or analytics scripts detected.
  8. Basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility.
  9. No explicit or adult content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML, CSS, and Font Awesome icons. There is no detected CMS or JavaScript frameworks. Hosting is via GoDaddy with nameservers indicating shared hosting. The site has basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO and performance optimizations. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site could benefit from modernization including HTTPS verification, improved meta tags, and enhanced accessibility features. Technical risks are low but include missing DNSSEC and security headers which could expose the site to DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anmari.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anmari.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.