Skip to main content

Security report for angelab.lv

SIA Apbedīšanas birojs “ANGEL” · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Apbedīšanas birojs “ANGEL” operates the website angelab.lv, providing comprehensive funeral services including traditional burial, cremation, repatriation, and related logistics primarily in Latvia and neighboring European countries. The company emphasizes respectful and dignified funeral ceremonies with 11 years of experience, targeting individuals and families in need of funeral arrangements. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, mobile responsiveness, and rich content including detailed service descriptions and team information. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates Google Tag Manager and ClickCease for analytics and ad fraud prevention. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching angelab.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable market position as a specialized funeral service provider with a full-service business model offering 24/7 consultations and multiple office locations in Riga and Jūrmala. Their partnership ecosystem includes service providers for disinfection, grave maintenance, senior care, and document translation, enhancing their service portfolio. The business model relies on direct client engagement via phone and online presence, with a focus on personalized and respectful service. Growth indicators include a decade-long operation and active social media engagement. The website content and structured data reflect a transparent and customer-focused approach, supporting trust and client acquisition.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent compliant with GDPR. Use of ClickCease indicates proactive ad fraud mitigation. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy or incident response information is available, which may impact transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file and formal incident response contacts to improve security maturity and compliance visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response page including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly review and update cookie consent mechanisms to maintain GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to strengthen business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Apbedīšanas birojs “ANGEL”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Apbedīšanas birojs “ANGEL”
Description
Apbedīšanas birojs Angel AB nodrošina diennakts apbedīšanas pakalpojumus, tostarp bēru organizēšanu, kremāciju, repatriāciju, transportēšanu uz morgu, dokumentu noformēšanu un atvadu ceremoniju organizēšanu Latvijā un citās valstīs.
Key services
Tradicionālā apbedīšana, Kremācija, Repatriācija, Transportēšana uz morgu, Dokumentu noformēšana, Atvadu ceremoniju organizēšana
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, Google Tag Manager, ClickCease, SVG graphics, JSON-LD structured data
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
ClickCease
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  4. Multiple physical office addresses and phone numbers provided.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  6. Use of Google Tag Manager and ClickCease for analytics and ad fraud prevention.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Business operates in funeral services sector in Latvia with 11 years experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and responsive design based on Bootstrap CSS framework, ensuring excellent mobile optimization and accessibility. Integration of Google Tag Manager and ClickCease shows attention to analytics and ad fraud prevention. The site loads multiple optimized images with WebP support and uses SVG for logos and icons, contributing to performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider details were identified. Performance is moderate, likely due to image sizes and external scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD data describing business and services. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are partially present. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with angelab.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review angelab.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.