Skip to main content

Security report for angel.co

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website wellfound.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) security challenge page that requires verification before access. This challenge page prevents retrieval of actual business content, metadata, or structured data, limiting the ability to analyze the company's services, market position, or technical infrastructure. The only contact information visible is an email address (team@wellfound.com) provided for support related to the challenge page. The domain is long-established, registered since 1998 with GoDaddy, and uses Cloudflare DNS services without DNSSEC enabled. Due to the blocking, the website's content quality, privacy compliance, and security posture cannot be fully assessed, resulting in a low overall AI score. The domain registration appears legitimate and consistent with a professional entity, but no further business details are available from the page content.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of angel.co. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching angel.co

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence data could be extracted from the blocked page. The domain age and registrar information suggest a mature business, but no company name, description, industry, or services are presented. No social media links, phone numbers, or physical addresses were found. The lack of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies further limits insights into compliance or operational maturity. The website likely serves a business audience but this cannot be confirmed from the current content.

Security posture

The website is protected by Cloudflare's WAF with Turnstile captcha, indicating a proactive security posture against automated threats. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details were available for review. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is partially observable but appears to rely heavily on Cloudflare's protection mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Work with Cloudflare to reduce false positives or improve user experience to avoid blocking legitimate users.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies on accessible pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Implement and publish security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Add structured data and metadata to improve SEO and business transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The page is a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha and 'Checking if the site connection is secure' message. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare WAF security challenge
  2. No actual business content or metadata available due to blocking
  3. Only contact email team@wellfound.com found in the challenge page text
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected
  5. No forms or user input fields except hidden captcha response field
  6. No social media or phone contact information found
  7. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata present
  8. No security headers or SSL details visible in provided data
  9. Domain is old and registered with GoDaddy, using Cloudflare DNS
  10. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare for DNS and security, including the Turnstile captcha service for bot mitigation. The HTML content is minimal and serves only as a security challenge page, lacking any business or marketing content. No CMS or frameworks are detectable from the provided data. The site does not have DNSSEC enabled, which is a technical security improvement opportunity. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to content blocking. The technical implementation is basic and focused on security filtering rather than content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium24 findingsView report
  2. 57/100Medium22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with angel.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review angel.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.