Skip to main content

Security report for angars.lv

Angars, SIA · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Angars, SIA is a small Latvian company with a website currently under construction. The site provides basic contact information including a physical address in Riga, a phone number, and an email address. The business description is minimal, and no detailed services or market positioning are presented. The website uses WordPress with the Divi theme and several plugins, indicating a moderate level of technical infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, but SEO and accessibility features are limited. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and privacy compliance documentation. Overall, the site appears legitimate but immature in content and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching angars.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a general audience in Latvia, but the business model and key services are not disclosed on the site. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests limited compliance maturity. No social media or partner domains are linked, indicating a standalone small business presence. The use of multiple Divi-related plugins suggests investment in website design and functionality, though the site is still in development. No certifications or trust indicators are visible, limiting business credibility signals.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, which is a positive security indicator. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site does not appear to expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided data. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, security maturity is basic and could be improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Include incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website content with detailed business descriptions and services to improve credibility and SEO.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of plugins and themes to ensure no vulnerabilities are present.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Angars, SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Angars, SIA
Description
Angars, SIA is a company located at Bākas iela 13, Ziemeļu rajons, Rīga, LV-1030, Latvia. The website indicates that a new site is under construction and provides contact details including phone and email.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Leaflet (maps), WPForms, Divi Pixel, Divi Mega Pro, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), Ivory Search, Breadcrumbs Divi Module, Divi Essential, Divi Plus, DiviFlash, DiviGrid
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Divi Pixel, WPForms, Ivory Search
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is under construction with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented on homepage.
  4. Uses WordPress with Divi theme and multiple plugins.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data.
  6. HTTPS is enabled with valid SSL.
  7. No social media links found.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond search plugin.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  10. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and several Divi-related plugins, indicating a modern but common CMS infrastructure. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain, with no external analytics or advertising scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good, but SEO is minimal with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations noted. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA labels on forms but no advanced accessibility enhancements. The site is currently under construction, limiting full technical assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with angars.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review angars.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.