Skip to main content

Security report for anfcma.it

Associazione Nazionale Famiglie Caduti e Mutilati dell'Aeronautica · Government · Italy

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in DNS health, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Associazione Nazionale Famiglie Caduti e Mutilati dell'Aeronautica (A.N.F.C.M.A.) is a longstanding Italian non-profit association dedicated to supporting families of fallen and mutilated members of the Italian Air Force. The website serves as an informational and engagement platform, offering details about the association's history, mission, activities, staff, and contact information. It targets families of military personnel, researchers, and members of the association. The organization operates with a moral and supportive mission rather than commercial intent, providing scholarships, awards, psychological support, and legal assistance to its members. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies including Blazor, Bootstrap, and various JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content structure, though performance is moderate. The domain is relatively new (created in 2023) and recently expired, which poses a risk to availability and trust. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliance appears addressed, but no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are found. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and DNSSEC is enabled, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security documentation. The expired domain status is a critical risk factor. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent domain renewal and enhanced security practices. Strategically, the association should prioritize domain renewal, implement security headers, document security policies, and establish incident response contacts to improve trust and resilience. Enhancing technical performance and accessibility would further benefit user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      Domain Expired

      Domain expired 5 days ago

      What to do: Renew domain registration immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anfcma.it

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
15
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired · found on this site
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention anfcma.it, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for anfcma.it right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association holds a unique position as a national non-profit entity serving families of fallen and mutilated air force personnel in Italy. Its competitive advantage lies in its historical legacy since 1937, moral mission, and close ties with military institutions. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, donations, and possibly public or private grants. The target customer segment is niche and highly specific: families of military personnel and related stakeholders. Growth indicators are limited but the association maintains partnerships with key institutional and related organizations, enhancing its ecosystem. The website reflects a stable but small-scale operation with a focus on community and support rather than commercial expansion.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The presence of HTTPS and DNSSEC are positive indicators, but the expired domain status is a significant vulnerability that could lead to domain hijacking or service disruption. The absence of security headers and incident response contacts indicates gaps in security best practices and readiness. GDPR compliance is addressed through privacy and cookie policies, but no dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The lack of analytics and tracking reduces privacy risks but also limits insight into user behavior. Overall, the security posture requires improvements in domain management, security header implementation, and formal security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Renew the domain registration immediately to prevent service disruption and security risks.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan with clear contact channels.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any vulnerable libraries or configurations.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and performance optimization to improve user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Associazione Nazionale Famiglie Caduti e Mutilati dell'Aeronautica
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Associazione Nazionale Famiglie Caduti e Mutilati dell'Aeronautica
Description
L’Associazione Nazionale Famiglie Caduti e Mutilati dell’Aeronautica (A.N.F.C.M.A.) è un'associazione morale senza scopo politico o commerciale che assiste le famiglie dei caduti e mutilati dell'Aeronautica Militare italiana.
Key services
Assistenza morale e materiale ai soci, Conservazione e diffusione di materiale documentale e statistico, Borse di studio, Premi e riconoscimenti, Sostegno psicologico, Tutela legale
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Blazor, Bootstrap, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Swiper, Glightbox, Radzen.Blazor, HTMX
Frameworks
Blazor
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. The site uses modern front-end technologies including Blazor and Bootstrap.
  3. Clear contact information and organizational transparency with staff photos.
  4. Domain expired recently, which is a security and availability risk.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  6. Cookie consent banner present and GDPR compliance appears addressed.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious approach.
  8. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  10. Website is well structured with clear navigation and relevant content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack centered on Blazor, supported by Bootstrap and various JavaScript libraries for animations and UI components. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, but performance is moderate, possibly due to multiple script inclusions and lack of advanced optimization. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected, suggesting a custom or self-hosted solution. The domain's recent creation and expired status indicate potential technical debt or administrative oversight. No analytics or tracking tools were found, which aligns with privacy-conscious design but limits data-driven improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate but requires domain management and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anfcma.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anfcma.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.