Skip to main content

Security report for anfas.cz

AnFas, spol. s r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AnFas, spol. s r.o. is a Czech-based branding, communication, and marketing agency focused on crafting clear, attractive, and beloved brands. Their services include naming, visual identity, brand messaging, web development, publications, presentations, marketing campaigns, and creative specialties. The company targets businesses seeking to strengthen their market position through effective communication and branding strategies. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with comprehensive case studies and client testimonials, including endorsement from branding guru Marty Neumeier. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and fullPage.js, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics 4, Smartlook, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel, all managed via Google Tag Manager. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility could be improved. From a security perspective, the site follows best practices with HTTPS and consent-based tracking but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or vulnerability disclosure. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly due to CZ.NIC policies, but the domain and website content indicate a legitimate and established business. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and privacy-conscious, with minor recommendations to enhance security headers, accessibility, and transparency around security policies. The business shows strong credibility and a clear market niche in branding and marketing services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anfas.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AnFas operates as a small-sized, specialized branding and marketing agency in the Czech Republic. Their competitive advantage lies in combining strategic branding with creative design and marketing execution. They serve clients facing communication challenges such as market competition, product complexity, and company transformation. Revenue streams likely come from consulting, creative services, and marketing campaigns. The company maintains partnerships or subsidiaries including JellyPot, IdentityOnline, and Jak dostat, indicating a broader ecosystem. The presence of detailed case studies and a testimonial from a recognized branding expert supports their market credibility. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on quality and client relationships rather than volume. Growth indicators include recent case studies and an active blog. The company’s digital presence is mature, leveraging multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize client engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Use of Google Tag Manager allows controlled loading of third-party scripts, reducing risk. Multiple analytics and tracking tools are deployed with opt-in consent, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No security.txt or incident response contact information is published, which could hinder vulnerability reporting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and demonstrate transparency.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AnFas, spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AnFas, spol. s r.o.
Description
Branding, communication, and marketing agency specializing in brand crafting, consulting, copywriting, design, and development.
Key services
Naming, Logo and visual identity, Brand messaging, Websites, Publications, Presentations, Visual content, Communication and content strategies, Advertising campaigns, Infographics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, fullPage.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Smartlook, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Orejime cookie consent
Frameworks
fullPage.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Smartlook, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Smartlook, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Leady tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, consistent with CZ.NIC policies.
  3. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented.
  4. Multiple tracking and analytics tools used with opt-in consent.
  5. Clear contact information with named personnel and company address.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  9. Good SEO and metadata implementation including Open Graph tags.
  10. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on homepage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and well-maintained technology stack including jQuery 3.6.0 and fullPage.js for smooth scrolling and UI effects. Analytics and marketing integrations are managed via Google Tag Manager, enabling flexible and secure script deployment. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses CDN-hosted libraries for performance. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images implemented. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and performant user experience with room for enhancements in accessibility and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anfas.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anfas.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.